People who want Calzaghe to lose, why is this?

[MANGLER]

I ain't got no problem wit Joe C but Roy is one of my favorites and I'll always rep him.

[FUC_U_PAYME]

Roy is one of my favorite boxers

[sparked_85]

uh oh, becareful bro, vanesboxing and his bitches will come in here and red k you citing racism against armenians! LOL! sad, but true.

But he is Armenian, balding and ugly. All facts.

Not Welsh and good looking.

The European population on these boards are mainly brits, why would we all of a sudden follow Abraham. He's a good fighter but that's like saying we'll all start supporting Timothy Bradley once Hatton loses at 140.

[Steak]

some people want him to lose because they dont think hes a good enough fighter to deserve to retire undefeated. same thing with someone like Sven Ottke, and the same reason why some people will argue all day that Castillo beat Mayweather in the first match, despite him winning in an immediate rematch.

[MELLY-MEL...]

But he is Armenian, balding and ugly. All facts.

Not Welsh and good looking.

The European population on these boards are mainly brits, why would we all of a sudden follow Abraham. He's a good fighter but that's like saying we'll all start supporting Timothy Bradley once Hatton loses at 140.

i agree bro, but i think it's funny how those ****s act when you say one of their fighters is this or that. it's quite pathetic, and i know first hand that they do in fact operate that way, and red k with a nasty msg if you talk in any way derogatory about vic, vanes, or arthur! no matter is still say vic aside good power can't box out of a wet paper bag. ****'em!!!!!

[sparked_85]

i agree bro, but i think it's funny how those ****s act when you say one of their fighters is this or that. it's quite pathetic, and i know first hand that they do in fact operate that way, and red k with a nasty msg if you talk in any way derogatory about vic, vanes, or arthur! no matter is still say vic aside good power can't box out of a wet paper bag. ****'em!!!!!

national pride I guess. They should be happy they have 3 boxers that are topics for discussion on a global chat forum, it's a tiny country. Alas Arthur is ugly, I'll take the hits for that, lol.

[Guest]

some people want him to lose because they dont think hes a good enough fighter to deserve to retire undefeated. same thing with someone like Sven Ottke, and the same reason why some people will argue all day that Castillo beat Mayweather in the first match, despite him winning in an immediate rematch.

In fairness while the Hopkins match was very close, I saw Ottke clearly lose every time I watched him.


(Except for that time he laid his Tyson like power on Mundine... right, Australian fans?)

[MELLY-MEL...]

in Fairness While The Hopkins Match Was Very Close, I Saw Ottke Clearly Lose Every Time I Watched Him.


(except For That Time He Laid His Tyson Like Power On Mundine... Right, Australian Fans?)

Hahahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Mr. Philadel]

You're right, I'm just a dumb ****. Silly old me. :wank:

yo.....you a real *****! Penis pleasers like you be f***** the site up. go the **** to bed *****!

[cortdawg25]

just Curious... What's The Reason?

I Don't Necessarily Want Him To Lose, I Think He Is Going To Lose. When U Look At The Styles Of Both Fighters, I Think It's More Favorable For Jones.

If Joe Keeps His Punch Output, He Leaves Himself Open For Quick Accurate Counter Shots That Could Put His Lights Out. Afterall He Don't Go The Thump To Make Roy Fold Up And Not Take A Risk. If Joe Limits His Output And Picks Hi Shots, Then That Plays Into Roys Hands Even More Becuase Now He Can Pace Himself And Box Joe, Time Joe.

Either Way I Think Roy Got The Edge.