Is Nard Hopkins Exciting or Boring?

[The Surgeon]

I mean right now at the age of 43 is he exciting or boring? Not the younger Hopkins who would go toe to toe sometimes and didnt mind a dog fight im talking the cautious, sneaky safety first veteran who's best boasts are he can take Away UR weapons and he has never been beat up?
Im not dis*****g he is great, the guys 43, its amazing to be operating at the level he does at his age but does he excite?

[deevel79]

Neither. You just have to have an aquired taste in order to enjoy his style.

[T-97]

I wouldn't say either, I think he's 'interesting' to watch.

In his prime, he was exciting though.

[deevel79]

I'd rather watch Bhop anyday of the week over Winky or Spinks. I'd rather get dental work than watch Spinks or Winky. It'll be less painfull.

[larryx]

he's a scientist..he disects his opponents..you have to be a BOXING fan to appreciate his style

[rizkybizness]

Neither. You just have to have an aquired taste in order to enjoy his style.

Perfect way to describe it.

Damn, son. You on a roll today, I'm a fan of yours.

[The Surgeon]

**** OFF guys - he's duller than an essay on bacteria!
Clinches excessivly, fouls, play acts, rarely throws a meaningfull punch and yeah he is good enough to take a guys weapons away but dont land much on him coz he's so focused on that! He is a spoiler and he spoils fights!

[deevel79]

Perfect way to describe it.

Damn, son. You on a roll today, I'm a fan of yours.

Where's the green k?? LOL.

[black.ink]

He's not boring, but he's far from exciting if you were looking for a brawling fight. I'd call it technical. It's not to everyones taste, but you can't hate it.

[The Hammer]

He's the MOST boring I've ever seen.

There was a guy called David Starie that fought Calzaghe in 2000 who was almost as bad, and then there's John Ruiz at heavyweight.

But B-Hop is the #1 most boring fighter of all.