When Hopkins became #1, there was no-one with as pressing a claim as Dawson has now.
If you can't see how a somone who has beaten Adamek, Johnson and Tarver (two of those by outstanding performances) at LHW is better than a career SMW who fought once at LHW and looked utter dog ****, then you're just confirming my su****ions - that you're basically nothing more than a Wlad Owns type character, and with as much credibility. **** glorified titles, use your ****ing eyes to see what's what.
Man, why do I even bother?
I've seen you Calzaghe fanboys say Joe takes Dawson, Toney, prime-Jones, Hagler, Wlad.
You guys are seriously the absolute pits.
I never denied the fact that when Hopkins became #1 there was no one with as pressing claim as Dawson has now. I said as much.
It's still just that though, a claim. As things factually stand, he beat the #1 guy and is the #1 guy.
Sorry you might not like it and I think there's some validity in it I accept, but people think guys in divisions all over have a claim to be higher ranked then they are, doesn't change things.
You arrogantly stating your right is better than me how exactly? I'm calmly explaining the stronger case why I merely agree with Ring, many organisations, sites, those inside boxing and a lot of people whom accept the logic a guy beat the #1 guy so is the #1 guy. You have little to stand on. So pull your pants up, stop crying about it and being abusive.
Dawson doesn't sound punch drunk to me. Some people mistakenly think if a fighter speaks with a drawl it means he is punch drunk. Some people naturally speak that way especially Southerners. The kid is from South Carolina. Dawson answered the interviewer's questions coherently which is a sign he is far from being punch drunk.
^or maybe he was never a good talker to begin with...some people just arn't good talkers..
Like me, i sound almost the same as Chad does and have struggled with a speech problem my whole life. He has barely even taken any punishment. Its genetics.
Comment