The Best Kessler vs. the Best Dawson...who wins?

[Sweet Pea 50]

The same way I knew Amir Khan would get knocked out by the first puncher he faced.

Dawson's chin is WEAK. There is no way in hell he would survive either of the uppercuts that Calzaghe ate.

Oh, so you want to go THAT route. So you are actually comparing Dawsons chin to KHANS?!? You that desperate to prove a point? Heh, all right. Zags has been down twice as well. Once to Byron Mitchell, and once to B-Hop. Zags came back to win those fights, as did Dawson in the fights he had been down. Could this be more of an indicator of Kesslers power being a little overated? You tell me....

[IMDAZED]

Your not debating seriously and you don't.

Your on of the most obstinate, arrogant men I've ever come across, twisting things any which way to suite your view.

You pick rows with calm respectful posters with it and end up looking like a class a scrouge whom no one wants to engage with.

By the way, I favour Dawson over Kessler but only just. And that's based on performances and ability, not names as your solely using to stamp down your view on this one.

You should really buy a mirror sometimes.

Aren't you the same guy who did what you are now accusing me of and then sent me PM's apologizing because you got clowned by OTHERS? When I never took a shot at you?

If you want to help your friend explain how Andrade is a better win than Tarver, feel free. if not...go away. We already know what YOU think.

[jangeorg]

Read the thread. Dawson's best win was against the 40 year old Tarver right?????????

You most be a ******,if you can`t read

[Kris Silver]

You should really buy a mirror sometimes.

Aren't you the same guy who did what you are now accusing me of and then sent me PM's apologizing because you got clowned by OTHERS? When I never took a shot at you?

If you want to help your friend explain how Andrade is a better win than Tarver, feel free. if not...go away. We already know what YOU think.

IMDAZED I completely embarrassed you, and even had to spell idiot for you correctly, as you got in wrong when calling me it. I did PM you cooling things over to be polite and diplomatic and you were more than friendly back. However any efforts to engage and exchange nicely with you are repeatedly returned with rude, stubborn obstinate posts from you, no matter who it is.

Bat's replied you with regards to Andrade, he never said he's better nor did I. Just chill out and stop being so rude imdazed, it gets in the way of everything and drills things on longer then they need. Is that so much to ask.

[Steak]

Oh, so you want to go THAT route. So you are actually comparing Dawsons chin to KHANS?!? You that desperate to prove a point? Heh, all right. Zags has been down twice as well. Once to Byron Mitchell, and once to B-Hop. Zags came back to win those fights, as did Dawson in the fights he had been down. Could this be more of an indicator of Kesslers power being a little overated? You tell me....

3 times. Calzaghe was put down and pretty badly hurt by Kabary Salem.

knockdowns can be deceiving. some of the guys with the best chins in the history of boxing have been down before, but that doesnt mean someone who hasnt ever gone down before has a better chin than them.

[IMDAZED]

IMDAZED I completely embarrassed you, and even had to spell idiot for you correctly, as you got in wrong when calling me it. I did PM you cooling things over to be polite and diplomatic and you were more than friendly back. However any efforts to engage and exchange nicely with you are repeatedly returned with rude, stubborn obstinate posts from you, no matter who it is.

Bat's replied you with regards to Andrade, he never said he's better nor did I. Just chill out and stop being so rude imdazed, it gets in the way of everything and drills things on longer then they need. Is that so much to ask.

Man, you embarassed yourself. You got so clowned in that thread - and not by me. And we never had beef so why would you PM me to "cool things over?" Just stop, please. And while you're at it, please stop jumping to personally attack me. It scares me, a bit. Attack my point of view, but not me. And look into buying that mirror.

Finally, if you don't know what Bat and I are talking about, stay out (although he needs your help bad). But hey, thanks for admitting YOU would never say Andrade is better than Tarver.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I personally think Dawsons resume is slightly better.

But isnt it amazing how you come on here and find the usual suspects who criticise 37 year old Joe Calzaghe because "OMG his best win was against a 43 year old LOLZ".

Yet 26 year old Chad Dawson can fight two 40 year olds back to back and be commended beyond all belief.

Ahhh double standards.

[jangeorg]

And you know this, how?

and you know **** about Kessler

[Kris Silver]

Man, you embarassed yourself. You got so clowned in that thread - and not by me. And we never had beef so why would you PM me to "cool things over?" Just stop, please. And while you're at it, please stop jumping to personally attack me. It scares me, a bit. Attack my point of view, but not me. And look into buying that mirror.

Finally, if you don't know what Bat and I are talking about, stay out (although he needs your help bad). But hey, thanks for admitting YOU would never say Andrade is better than Tarver.

The entire point of my addressing your obstinate attitude is the fact you can't be debated with nicely unless it's addressed. There's little value conversing with you because of it.

What do you type up, but more of the same. Your a very unique human, a counsellor would refuse to see you.

I clearly know what your talking about and I think I consider what anyone says a lot more before you reply with rude I'm right responses.

It was never said Andrades better than Tarver so why say it? I said I'd probably favour Dawson over Kessler but only just and may change my mind, because I've judged it mostly on the ability and styles I've seen of them.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Your not debating seriously and you don't.

Your on of the most obstinate, arrogant men I've ever come across, twisting things any which way to suite your view.

You pick rows with calm respectful posters with it and end up looking like a class a scrouge whom no one wants to engage with.

By the way, I favour Dawson over Kessler but only just and I might change my mind next week, that's the beauty of being open minded. And that's based on performances, ability and styles, not names as your solely using to stamp down your view on this one.

Absolutely spot on mate.

The guy is the most unneccasirily obnoxious and arrogant **** on this forum. He argues over the smallest of details and thinks hes "won" the debate.

He once tried to say I knew nothing about boxing because I thought Hopkins debuted at LHW. When actually he weighed two pounds over the limit.

Hes probably spell checking this post as you read it to score more brownie points.