Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Better performance Vitali or Dawson?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Better performance Vitali or Dawson?

    Vitali beat a young determined buck, while Dawson disposed of an older fighter but talented fighter tarver... I think Dawson got hit more then Vitali though, but is tarver more talented then peter at this stage in tarvers career. Is it too hard to call?
    37
    Vitali
    48.65%
    18
    Dawson
    37.84%
    14
    Too Close to call
    13.51%
    5
    Last edited by ACHlLLES; 10-11-2008, 10:41 PM.

  • #2
    I was more impressed with Dawson because Dawson and Tarver were more evenly matched (physically). Although I was impressed with Vitali's CLEAR DOMINATION over Peter, it's pretty obvious he had such an easy time because of the sheer difference in height and reach. Vitali kept him at bay all night and kept unloading, I don't think we would be singing the same tune if Peter was the same height as Vitali.

    Comment


    • #3
      clitchko v peter was a TERRIBLE snoozefest

      peter is toosmall...1 dimensional.. and old

      and vitali moves like a geriatric


      tarver v dawson was one sided ..but competitive talent and skill wise..dawson and tarver trump clit and peter in a landslide

      Comment


      • #4
        dawson because of the level of competition

        Comment


        • #5
          Dawson fought a disciplined fight and beat Tarver decisively but a 37 year old Vitali completely dominated a title holder after a 4 year layoff.

          Peter is one of the worst title holders but it's still impressive.

          Comment


          • #6
            Vitali's performance was way more impressive

            coming off a 4 year layoff and getting a dominant TKO win over Prime Sam Peter in 8 rounds (Peter had never been stopped before)

            Dawson's UD win was impressive too....but Tarver was 40 years old and shot.....Prime Tarver vs Dawson would've been a different story
            Last edited by WLAD OWNS; 10-11-2008, 10:47 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Considering the circumstances, I think Klitschko's was more impressive.

              Comment


              • #8
                hard to say, actually. Tarver at 39 is still way way better than Peter, but on the other hand, Vitali was coming off a big layoff...

                the fact that he didnt get injured leading up to this fight is probebly the most impressive thing. puts both the victories to shame

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View Post
                  Vitali's performance was way more impressive

                  coming off a 4 year layoff and getting a dominant TKO over Prime Sam Peter in 8 rounds (Peter had never been stopped before)

                  Dawson's UD win was impressive too....but Tarver was 40 years old and shot.....Prime Tarver vs Dawson would've been a different story
                  tarver is in great shape for his age.. peter is shot (27?)

                  clitchko fought a small tomato can..thats what it came down to...not really impressive

                  not vitalis fault that hes 68 but it is what it is

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Of course I'm going to say that Dawson impressed me personally the most, but with all of that aside Klitschko impressed the hell out of me, and i would like to see him clean up that horrible division. Incredible how someone could have a 4 year layoff and still look prime.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP