F.U.UC.K the open scoring system

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • El Dominicano
    Banned
    • Aug 2007
    • 10074
    • 226
    • 49
    • 10,758

    #21
    I agree...**** Open Scoring! That **** needz to go.

    Comment

    • ACHlLLES
      watch ur mouth
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8398
      • 236
      • 359
      • 15,211

      #22
      Originally posted by chiyoko
      There was little incentive,he was way behind.If he hadnt known he would have continued and with Vitali now breathing heavily we could have seen a slugfest
      I could be wrong, but boxing and or slugfest(similar to vitali/lennox's slugfest) wouldn't have ended good for peter either. I think Vitali would have knocked him out... If Sam Peter slugged it out, he'd leave himself too open to be countered.

      Comment

      • Bobby Shaw
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 4308
        • 236
        • 29
        • 39,810

        #23
        Originally posted by MacChamp
        I could be wrong, but boxing and or slugfest(similar to vitali/lennox's slugfest) wouldn't have ended good for peter either. I think Vitali would have knocked him out... If Sam Peter slugged it out, he'd leave himself too open to be countered.
        He would have lost but would have gone down fighting than on the stool.If anyone loses the first 5 rounds the way Peter lost you just lose the will to fight.

        My point is that makes many fighters to quit and thats not good for boxing,we dont need anymore quittos

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP