Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LMAO, why does everyone think Pavlik has great stamina?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LMAO, why does everyone think Pavlik has great stamina?

    because he beats taylor in the late rounds?

    I seem to remember 40+ hopkins even beating taylor late and the only reason he lost was because he started late.

    Taylor has HORRIBLE stamina and he gasses in every fight, pavlik has average work rate.

  • #2
    Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
    because he beats taylor in the late rounds?

    I seem to remember 40+ hopkins even beating taylor late and the only reason he lost was because he started late.

    Taylor has HORRIBLE stamina and he gasses in every fight, pavlik has average work rate.
    You mean throwing 90+ punches a round is average?

    Comment


    • #3
      Pavlik faded late against Taylor, only to find an even more faded JT across from him.


      Pavlik's stamina is ok but it's not on the Calzaghe-Mayweather scale.

      Comment


      • #4
        Throwing 70-80 hard punches a round is very good stamina.

        Comment


        • #5
          he averaged 70 a round against taylor, that aint that great considering taylor just stands there and has poor footwork.

          Comment


          • #6
            because he does.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
              he averaged 70 a round against taylor, that aint that great considering taylor just stands there and has poor footwork.
              Taylor presented a harder target to hit for Pavlik during the rematch than he did in their first fight.

              Pavlik has very good stamina, he sets a high pace that most of his opponents can't keep up with. I haven't seen him tire in any of his fights.

              He also throws his punches with power and doesn't conserve energy.
              Last edited by TheGreatA; 10-06-2008, 07:20 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
                because he beats taylor in the late rounds?

                I seem to remember 40+ hopkins even beating taylor late and the only reason he lost was because he started late.

                Taylor has HORRIBLE stamina and he gasses in every fight, pavlik has average work rate.
                Pavlik average workrate?? Pavlik has a verry high workrate and great stamina. His high workrate is his biggest favour.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
                  he averaged 70 a round against taylor, that aint that great considering taylor just stands there and has poor footwork.

                  "Aint that great"?!?
                  He did what he had to do to win both CHAMPIONSHIP fights! What's not great about that?
                  You weren't impressed by his resilient comeback to knockout JT the first time, and you don't have the eye to spot good performance in the final rounds of their 2nd fight - That's YOUR problem, not Pavlik's!


                  [IMG]http://i423.***********.com/albums/pp312/anonymousboxing/cotto20.gif?t=1221838066[/IMG]

                  [IMG]http://i423.***********.com/albums/pp312/anonymousboxing/delamoney.gif[/IMG]

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Pavlik has good stamina.
                    Mayweather maybe has great stamina but it was never tested
                    Calzaghe's stamina does look great but is only good. His punches are a variety of slaps, punches and pitypat, which doesn't need as much energy as only real punches.
                    Maybe his stamina was better when he was younger.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP