Holyfield has the best resume in boxing.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Davros?
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 5224
    • 153
    • 0
    • 12,360

    #31
    Originally posted by DuttyAlacrity
    It can be argued when Holyfield fought Tyson he was past his prime, but he was not washed up! He only had one lost (busta Douglas) he recently came off a devasting win to pick up one version of the hw title (WBC i think) and he was a favourite going in. In fact, by the time they fought many already considered Holyfield out of his prime also. The Tyson that fought Lewis... that's a diff story....

    Holyfield's resume is by far one the best in modern times....
    I agree Tyson wasn’t at his peak but he was still a good fighter in 1995-1997, He had recently beaten Bruno who although nothing special was a good heavyweight.

    Comment

    • steptwome
      N.Y State of Mind
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 2285
      • 94
      • 5
      • 8,863

      #32
      Holyfield has an impressive record... no doubt...but to say he has "the best resume" is objective.

      Comment

      • xAUGUSTUSx
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2006
        • 2939
        • 113
        • 0
        • 3,173

        #33
        Originally posted by tito yuca
        So what if Holyfield faught all those guys, he has 9 losses.
        Because he fought everyone. Have some common sense. I never once said Holyfield was the G.O.A.T.

        Comment

        • LEFTYGUNZZ
          GUNZ 4 HIRE
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 4264
          • 218
          • 184
          • 10,891

          #34
          Originally posted by xAUGUSTUSx
          Take a look at who Holyfield has fought. Tillman, Qawi, Tillis, Thomas, Dokes, Stewart x2, Douglas, Foreman, Cooper, Holmes, Bowe x3, Moorer x2, Mercer, Tyson x2, Lewis x2, Ruiz x3, Toney, Rahman, Byrd, Donald, Savarese, and Ibragimov. Who else has fought let alone beat Tyson, Bowe, Lewis, Holmes, and Foreman?
          Originally posted by irishjohn88
          are we talking active boxers, or all time?
          I guess we are talking boxers of at least the modern era. I hate when fellas bringup boxers they never saw fight....Jack Johnson, Dempsey eyc....You only saw some clips and usually highlights reels like the when they show you the coming attractions to a movie of course they show you the best part....Holy has one of the best ever if not the best reumes fought all top at Cruiser and heavy....more Champs on that list then anyone I have seen...Ali has a decnt resume as well sir...You could make cases for some other but these two come to mind.. Ali fought Fraizer, Foreman, Norton, Ellis, Holmes, Liston, Paterson, .Lefty

          Comment

          • COACH WEBB
            R.I.P. Jimmy!!
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 5033
            • 223
            • 98
            • 11,318

            #35
            Originally posted by xAUGUSTUSx
            Take a look at who Holyfield has fought. Tillman, Qawi, Tillis, Thomas, Dokes, Stewart x2, Douglas, Foreman, Cooper, Holmes, Bowe x3, Moorer x2, Mercer, Tyson x2, Lewis x2, Ruiz x3, Toney, Rahman, Byrd, Donald, Savarese, and Ibragimov. Who else has fought let alone beat Tyson, Bowe, Lewis, Holmes, and Foreman?
            good point...btw he came to town last week and we had a chance to see him again (hes good friends with my pops)....

            Comment

            • tito yuca
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2006
              • 1843
              • 237
              • 233
              • 8,377

              #36
              Originally posted by xAUGUSTUSx
              Because he fought everyone. Have some common sense. I never once said Holyfield was the G.O.A.T.
              My point is that to have a great resume should mean that you beat a lot of those guys. If he just FOUGHT the best, which he did, then you should say "he faced the best competetion". "Resume" implies achievements, and just fighting someone isn't enough, you should defeat them to be able to say your resume is good.

              Comment

              • xAUGUSTUSx
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2006
                • 2939
                • 113
                • 0
                • 3,173

                #37
                Yea you right man.

                Comment

                • Allucard
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 5979
                  • 393
                  • 56
                  • 12,399

                  #38
                  Originally posted by tito yuca
                  My point is that to have a great resume should mean that you beat a lot of those guys. If he just FOUGHT the best, which he did, then you should say "he faced the best competetion". "Resume" implies achievements, and just fighting someone isn't enough, you should defeat them to be able to say your resume is good.
                  Where does that leave Oscar De La Hoya?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP