Whos the better boxer? Oscar or Cotto?
Collapse
-
-
I think it's in honor of his in laws, kids and wife.
and it's amazing how the hate for Oscar, myself included, has clouded what a good fighter he was in his prime. Pre 147 the kid was a beast 24-0 21KOs if I am not mistaken and most of those coming off of his vaunted left hook.
The problem with Oscar is that he got caught up in his own hype and wanted to box more thus changing trainers often. Rather than sticking with what made him a beast at 140 and tweaking little things here and there he tried revamping everything at times and IMO it muddled his style.
but dont get it twisted even and ever changing Oscar still had better skills than what Cotto possesesComment
-
oscar by far now and in his prime..his left jab is way better than cottos, in his prime he is probably the best technical boxer the sport has seen since sugar ray leanord..yes better than mayweather too(however mayweather is a better evasive fighter) but in all around skill there hasnt been really anyone you can say is better technically than oscar in the last 15-20 years
The bold you are spot on. Now the bold and underlined you just went way to far that **** is not even close to being true. I don't even see how you came up with that. Please elaborate on how you can to this conclusion.Comment
-
Oscar was not in shape at all for the Sturm fight. Sturm is a technically sound fighter who he should've been more prepaired for. If you know boxing you would know this is true. Plus Sturm is a true 160 ILBer. Sturm would outbox Cotto fairly easy.Comment
-
Comment
-
We agree on something, man. That's intense!!... I also think a prime Oscar stops Cotto. To be honest, I think a prime Oscar destroys Cotto.Comment
-
Comment


Comment