Rarely do I see Boxing in the NY Times Sports Section. Sometimes it appears under a little, quarter-of-a-page-long column called "other sports," where it is listed after lacrosse, field hockey, horse racing, water polo, poker, cricket, badminton, simon says, pictionary, miniature golf, scrabble and marbles, waaay in the back pages of the sport section mind you. Most times though, it doesn't appear at all.
Today I see a little blip about Boxing and got excited, only to read two ridiculous sentences. (paraphrase) Oscar De La Hoya has decided not to retire after his December showdown with Pacquiao. He feels he still has a few more fights in him at the elite level."
Listen, I don't have any issue with the Golden Boy fighting on- I think he should. I just think that
A. this was always obvious.
B. Im sick of Oscar dominating the boxing news
C. I'm sick of the lack of boxing coverage in the mainstream media and
D. I'm especially sick of 'B' (Oscar dominating boxing news) considering 'C' (that the boxing coverage is so minimal in the mainstream news).
Your thoughts?!?
Today I see a little blip about Boxing and got excited, only to read two ridiculous sentences. (paraphrase) Oscar De La Hoya has decided not to retire after his December showdown with Pacquiao. He feels he still has a few more fights in him at the elite level."
Listen, I don't have any issue with the Golden Boy fighting on- I think he should. I just think that
A. this was always obvious.
B. Im sick of Oscar dominating the boxing news
C. I'm sick of the lack of boxing coverage in the mainstream media and
D. I'm especially sick of 'B' (Oscar dominating boxing news) considering 'C' (that the boxing coverage is so minimal in the mainstream news).
Your thoughts?!?
Comment