Why is JMM Calling out Carlos Hernandez instead of Replying Campbell's Invitation?

[BennyST]

Whereas it's alright for Pac to fight an even older Barrera, a Morales that was ten times more shot than Casa will ever be three times who had lost his last couple of fights, then another old fighter in Marquez and now a fighter who has lost more than half of his recent fights and is also well beyond his good fighting years at 36 or whatever and a hack in Diaz.

Mate, you need to get a grip. Every time you post you look like a damn fool. You're scarily obsessed with Marquez for whatever reason. He's been fighting great opponents one after another which is more than you can say for the majority of fighters out there today. He has taken on the top guys in each division he has been in. What more is there?

As you can see above, you can spin who a fighter fights any way you want. The average age of Pac's opponents is probably a lot older than the guys Marquez has faced. They were also more shot than the fighters Marquez has been facing.

Barrera had lost before fighting Pac the second time. Morales had lost twice. Oscar has lost most of his recent fights. At least Marquez has been facing guys who have been on winning streaks.

See? You can make it sound like any fighter is facing hacks when the truth is they are not.



Edit: This fight hasn't even been confirmed. Instead of posting your usual ****e incessantly why don't you wait until a fight has actually been signed.

[Jose Rizal]

Ever since that controversial "win" over Santa Cruz which he refused to make certain with a rematch, Casa has practically for all intents and purposes lost his lineal ascendancy. Juan Diaz became the true lightweight king pin to anyone with a brain to see what the true score really was, and with Diaz's zero gone, Nate rightfully became numero uno in the division.

[flotorres]

Hey ****** he's not calling carlos hernandez his promoters are the ones that are looking for a fighter for him he's not scare of nobody remember he's a mexican ok.

[Sonic Flood]

Whereas it's alright for Pac to fight an even older Barrera, a Morales that was ten times more shot than Casa will ever be three times who had lost his last couple of fights, then another old fighter in Marquez and now a fighter who has lost more than half of his recent fights and is also well beyond his good fighting years at 36 or whatever and a hack in Diaz.

Mate, you need to get a grip. Every time you post you look like a damn fool. You're scarily obsessed with Marquez for whatever reason. He's been fighting great opponents one after another which is more than you can say for the majority of fighters out there today. He has taken on the top guys in each division he has been in. What more is there?

As you can see above, you can spin who a fighter fights any way you want. The average age of Pac's opponents is probably a lot older than the guys Marquez has faced. They were also more shot than the fighters Marquez has been facing.

Barrera had lost before fighting Pac the second time. Morales had lost twice. Oscar has lost most of his recent fights. At least Marquez has been facing guys who have been on winning streaks.

See? You can make it sound like any fighter is facing hacks when the truth is they are not.



Edit: This fight hasn't even been confirmed. Instead of posting your usual ****e incessantly why don't you wait until a fight has actually been signed.

Morales was 27 years old when Pac fought him and then he is 10 times shot more than Casa at the age of 27? Don't make me LMAO.. Casa is 37 years old and his legs weren't there. Do you think if a Prime Castillo and Corrales couldn't hurt him how much more of a JMM who moed up in weight? It only shows Casa is shot. Pacquiao beat a prime Barrera so whether the second fight is there or not, there's nothing to prove because he already did it 5 years ago.

You're totally ******ed.. Your praising him because he fought Juarez? Dude Barrera beat that man twice already.. Casamayor? You're praising him for beating Casa and then you're saying Morales at 27 years old is 10 times shot? Dude You're a complete Bull****...

I can't stand how bias you are parising Marquez like a God over his big wins against Juarez, Barrera and Casamayor.

[BennyST]

Morales was 27 years old when Pac fought him and then he is 10 times shot more than Casa at the age of 27? Don't make me LMAO.. Casa is 37 years old and his legs weren't there. Do you think if a Prime Castillo and Corrales couldn't hurt him how much more of a JMM who moed up in weight? It only shows Casa is shot. Pacquiao beat a prime Barrera so whether the second fight is there or not, there's nothing to prove because he already did it 5 years ago.

You're totally ******ed.. Your praising him because he fought Juarez? Dude Barrera beat that man twice already.. Casamayor? You're praising him for beating Casa and then you're saying Morales at 27 years old is 10 times shot? Dude You're a complete Bull****...

I can't stand how bias you are parising Marquez like a God over his big wins against Juarez, Barrera and Casamayor.

No dude, you're a complete bull****!

[Sonic Flood]

no Dude, You're A Complete Bull****!

Ok..................

[BennyST]

Ok..................

You fail.

[Sonic Flood]

You fail.

You're a funny comedian. hahahahaha

[BennyST]

You're a funny comedian. hahahahaha

Thanks mate. You're not.

[Sonic Flood]

Thanks mate. You're not.

Of course. I'm not a comedian coz I'm serious. You're funny because you are a complete joke.