holyfield looked far from shot in the sultan fight

**larryx** · 09-30-2008, 10:31 PM

what do you guys think??

**Thread Stealer** · 09-30-2008, 10:33 PM

He looked like an old man (which he is), and Sultan looked like ****.

**larryx** · 09-30-2008, 10:39 PM

Originally posted by Thread Stealer

He looked like an old man (which he is), and Sultan looked like ****.

so it was more of sultan than him?

**WLAD OWNS** · 09-30-2008, 10:42 PM

The judges scores were accurate....Sultan was too fast for old Holyfield, he clearly won the fight.

Sultan hurt Holyfield bad with a body shot in the 10th round, but he backed off and didn't capatilaize, he would've KO'd Holy if he had jumped on him after that body shot.

**Zocalo** · 09-30-2008, 10:43 PM

Um no......

**Jose Rizal** · 09-30-2008, 10:54 PM

He's TOO OLD to fight at top level so what's the point? He could get hurt badly.

**warp1432** · 09-30-2008, 10:56 PM

Have you seen him fight in the 90s?

**The Hammer** · 09-30-2008, 10:58 PM

Originally posted by larryx

118-110,117-111 twice were incorrect scores..he could still pull the trigger and did the most damage in that fight..holyfield may never win another title but he can beat 90 percent of todays heavys at 46.. in that fight he showed he wasnt shot at all..good showing for the real deal todays heavys can learn alot from him,he comes in great shape(actually has a 6 pack)he has heart(unlike hassim rahman) he is the real deal

The scoring was accurate in that fight - Ibragimov clearly won a wide decision.

Holyfield would be hurt at his age against a strong young fighter like Arreola or Povetkin, he needs to stay retired.

**Silencers** · 09-30-2008, 10:59 PM

He is a very old fighter.

holyfield looked far from shot in the sultan fight