So called biased American fans

[-Swizzy-]

It says at the side 'Total votes: 345'.

I'm not sure that's a large enough sample to prove anything.

Even if the whole of America voted, one fight wouldn't be enough to prove much, would it? Unless it suited what you wanted to believe...

if 300mill American fans voted on every euro-american fight for the european fighter, you would still find a way to make it out that Americans are biased.

[UncleCuntington]

if 300mill American fans voted on every euro-american fight for the european fighter, you would still find a way to make it out that Americans are biased.

Where did I say that Americans are biased?

I pointed out the obvious flaw in your logic, and you can't answer that so you're responding with an accusation.

[SkilledB]

americans are ****phobic.

they're against paulie because he's a fudgepacker.

duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhh

[-Swizzy-]

Where did I say that Americans are biased?

I pointed out the obvious flaw in your logic, and you can't answer that so you're responding with an accusation.

its only an obvious flaw to you. of course I'm making an accusation cuz you are nit-picking. since yesterday, there have been 300 more votes and the poll is basically the same.

[UncleCuntington]

its only an obvious flaw to you.

You're saying that, apart from me, everyone else in the world would agree that you can judge an entire nation's level of bias on an entire sport simply by looking at the views of 345 people regarding one event?

Please, find me one respected researcher in any field who believes that such conclusions can be drawn from such a tiny sample.

of course I'm making an accusation cuz you are nit-picking.

That makes no sense. By your own admission, your accusation is not based upon fact. You accuse people of things because they don't agree with your severely-flawed methodology. Sad.

since yesterday, there have been 300 more votes and the poll is basically the same.

The sample size is still too small, especially in New York, where there were less than 40 votes when you made your over-generalisation.

[-Swizzy-]

You're saying that, apart from me, everyone else in the world would agree that you can judge an entire nation's level of bias on an entire sport simply by looking at the views of 345 people regarding one event?

Please, find me one respected researcher in any field who believes that such conclusions can be drawn from such a tiny sample.

That makes no sense. By your own admission, your accusation is not based upon fact. You accuse people of things because they don't agree with your severely-flawed methodology. Sad.

The sample size is still too small, especially in New York, where there were less than 40 votes when you made your over-generalisation.

so you think that if 10million more ppl voted that the poll would change in malinaggi's favor? I personally don't think so.

if out of 600 americans 70% think hatton is gonna win, that is good enough for me to know that americans are not biased.

[lazyitis]

The americans would have to be pretty ****in dumb to let their bias cloud their view to the point of picking Paulie over Hatton.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I love when kswizzy tries to prove something but fails horrible

600 people out of 60 million is enough for him though

I just voted on one of those polls. Most of the Yanks that actually voted probably dont even know who Malignaggi is.

[bsrizpac]

I love when kswizzy tries to prove something but fails horrible

600 people out of 60 million is enough for him though

I just voted on one of those polls. Most of the Yanks that actually voted probably dont even know who Malignaggi is.

I love when DirkDiggler pretends to be objective and not hate Americans but shows up on every thread about Americans like a jealous insecure *****.

[The Gully Gad]

And i love the way u both go at it!!! heheh
Priceless.....