If Pacman fought Marquez again between 2009 and 2010, and wins again...

[badboypeenoy]

...would people say he again defeated a washed-up Mexican fighter, just like when Pacman defeated Barrera and Morales?

[ACHlLLES]

Theres no point to a Pacquiao/Marquez III fight honestly, because if Pacquiao destroys Marquez in the 3rd fight leaving no doubt who was the winner. People will always make excuses and say Marquez was past it. They'll never give pacquiao any credit.

[Unstable89]

Theres no point to a Pacquiao/Marquez III fight honestly, because if Pacquiao destroys Marquez in the 3rd fight leaving no doubt who was the winner. People will always make excuses and say Marquez was past it. They'll never give pacquiao any credit.

Agreed, Pacman won the second fight and the first could have gone either way. JMM-Campbell would be the better option

[Sonic Flood]

Pac beat JMM twice.. No need for a 3rd fight.

[PapaMo]

...would people say he again defeated a washed-up Mexican fighter, just like when Pacman defeated Barrera and Morales?

you mean just like JMM defeated past his prime barrera and casa. lol

[badboypeenoy]

Pac beat JMM twice.. No need for a 3rd fight.

Yeah, and if ever that happens, win or lose I'm afraid Manny will not get anything out of that. He wins, Marquez in shot..he loses, he lost to a shot fighter.

[KLITSCHKO.]

Hatton would destroy both of those bloody ****s on the same night

[badboypeenoy]

you mean just like JMM defeated past his prime barrera and casa. lol

Yeah, that would be BETTER examples

[PapaMo]

Hatton would destroy those both of those bloody ****s on the same night

JUst like how he destroyed the both past their prime koztya and castillo. lol

[badboypeenoy]

Hatton would destroy both of those bloody ****s on the same night

Hatton? Only thing he can destroy together in the same night are a tub of kentucky fried chicken and a dozen quarter-pounders with cheese.