Mike tells his version
Did Marvin Hagler Duck Mike Mccallum??
Collapse
-
-
Looking at Haglers record it seems the best oppertunity he had to fight McCallum was in 86 between Hearns and Leonard. But he fought Mugabi instead.
Mugabi was 25-0 with 25 KO's. U can see why he was a draw.
McCallum became light middleweight champion in 84, so maybe he still wasnt a big draw and Hagler was looking to fight either Leonard or Hearns.
Its a shame McCallum didnt get to fight at least one of the fabulous 4.Comment
-
Nah, McCallum was a junior middleweight when Hagler was on top of the MW division.
You can argue that Roberto Duran or Tommy Hearns avoided McCallum. But Duran took huge risks when he was supposed to fight McCallum, his mandatory. The McCallum fight offered $500k. The Hagler fight offered $5 mil. What would've been a unification bout with Hearns (Duran got stripped for fighting) offered three times the payday as a McCallum fight, and as what you say in the fight, Hearns was not exactly a small risk for Duran.
It would've been great to see Hearns fight McCallum around in the mid 80s, at 154.Comment
-
-
Not sure about that. From what I've heard McCallum often got the best of Hearns in sparring.
The difference is that while Hearns got his chances to prove himself as a great in big fights against Leonard, Duran and Hagler, McCallum didn't (aside from the Curry fight) until he was well in his 30's against much younger fighters like James Toney and Roy Jones.
It's no surprise McCallum is still bitter about it.
Atleast he always gave the upcoming fighters a chance, he fought Julian Jackson, James Toney, Roy Jones, Steve Collins, Michael Watson...
I do agree that a fight against McCallum wouldn't have made sense for Hagler at the time and it's not like Hagler had it easy, he fought the best young contenders and old veterans before getting big fights against Duran, Hearns and Leonard.Comment
Comment