Joe Calzaghe Vacates WBO Title After a Ten-Year Run
Collapse
-
Whoever doesn't know **** about boxing reads the original post and will think Calzaghe is the best fighter who ever lived! hahahahaComment
-
Funny isn't it that someone could read a factual account of Calzaghe's career and come away with the impression that he is one of history's best boxers.Comment
-
It's obvious that he really is going to retire after the RJJ fight either way. he wants no part of pavlik! Man **** Calzaghe i hope RJJ ****s him up!!! Seriously outside of the UK will anyone really remember Calzaghe???Comment
-
Roy Jones best three wins are over a Hopkins who had never even held a world title, James Toney and John Ruiz. At 160 and 168 he fought average opponents. At 175 he beat some good boxers Virgil Hill, Montell Griffin etc. Calzaghe fought some good fighters too, former world champions Reid, Mitchell, Brewer, Woodhall.Comment
-
At 175 Jones beat a better class of opposition. McCallum, Griffin, Hill, Del Valle, Harding, Reggie Johnson and Clinton Woods represent a step up in terms of average quality, whether they are anything to write home about is debatable, but these are the type of fights I defend in general and there are certainly more of them both in quantity and proportionality than in Calzaghe's defences list, and they allowed Jones to unify the division.
Then of course he stepped up and won the HW title which is a big plus for an ex LMW, even against Ruiz. So in the end, even taking into account Jones losses, his resume tops Calzaghe's, but people should not make the mistake of believing Jones was beating top class guy after top class guy, the major difference between his and Calzagh's resume is quantity, not quality, both in terms of opponents and in terms of weight divisions and titles.Comment
-
The reality of Jones career is that outside of his marquee fights with Toney and Hopkins, his resume is average at 160 and 168. Who are the best fighters he faced here? Malinga, Thornton and Lucas?
At 175 Jones beat a better class of opposition. McCallum, Griffin, Hill, Del Valle, Harding, Reggie Johnson and Clinton Woods represent a step up in terms of average quality, whether they are anything to write home about is debatable, but these are the type of fights I defend in general and there are certainly more of them both in quantity and proportionality than in Calzaghe's defences list, and they allowed Jones to unify the division.
Then of course he stepped up and won the HW title which is a big plus for an ex LMW, even against Ruiz. So in the end, even taking into account Jones losses, his resume tops Calzaghe's, but people should not make the mistake of believing Jones was beating top class guy after top class guy, the major difference between his and Calzagh's resume is quantity, not quality, both in terms of opponents and in terms of weight divisions and titles.Comment
Comment