Roy Jones: "Toney would beat the Klitschko brothers"

[Davros?]

Klitschkos along with Lewis where/are the first big men to actually fight, and have skills, not freak shows who only fought/fight thanks to their size. Like Carnera and Valuev.

That is partly true but Willard had a style very much like Wlad and Vitali.

[BennyST]

but Jones does what he does best, runs his mouth and avoids getting his ass beat. In his so called prime years 95-2003 have people forgotten that Roy was hand picking guys like Frazier a part timer, and faded champs like McCallum when the real challenge was Dariuz. Only after Michalczweski lost did Roy conveniently start saying he was never a threat.

Jones preferred the no hopers over a true contender.

Anyone who can beat both Toney and Hopkins when both were in their primes is a very special fighter and that in itself says a lot with just those two names. You only need to bring up those two wins of Jones' to show that he didn't avoid the toughest fights out there because those two were shown to be two of the best fighters of the last fifty years. It's ridiculous to think Jones would fight those guys but avoid Darius. Darius would have lost to both Toney and Hopkins.

[theghost#1]

Roy gives his ******ed opinion on Toney vs The Klitschkos

Roy is cool and all, But there is a reason why he is not with HBO anymore. He doesn't have good intellectual skills, And for making bold statements like this one. Either Klitschko makes a mockery of Toney.

[Davros?]

It isnt ****** because he picked Toney to win, but rather the logic he used in picking Toney to win seemed very very weak.. It was very weak, even for a triangle theory.

Yeah your right.

[Pugilistic™]

Both klitschkos would dominate Toney.

That was a bad analysis for jones there.