CJ vs JMM is not a robbery!!

**BlackHat** · 09-20-2008, 08:34 AM

Originally posted by Geogoreya

Chris John fight against Juan Manuel Marquez is a robbery, i am an indonesian and i life in Indonesia, i watch that fight live but too bad i didn't record it, it wasn't a robbery it was a close fight but after the point deduction, it is john who win. i think Marquez won 5 round and john won 7 round, so it is a close fight and it wasn't a robbery

ok............................

**Sonic Flood** · 09-20-2008, 08:39 AM

WIth no point deduction, John still won the fight.. Chris John definitely beat his ass.

**badboypeenoy** · 09-20-2008, 08:42 AM

Yeah sure. Unless we see the complete video of that fight, we'd have doubts. How can you NOT HAVE a video of Chris John's biggest career win?!

Cebuanos for example doesn't post fights of their fighters who won by robbery. Ciso Morales vs. Muangklang for example, or the latest fights by ALA boys, Weng Haya and Jomanz Omanz, ALL ROBBERY. So they don't post the videos online, heck they even edited it out of the delayed telecast.

Bottomline, we don't care if you are the President of Indonesia, no video = robbery.

**Silencers** · 09-20-2008, 08:43 AM

It wasn't a robbery, it was a pretty close fight but it definitely wasn't a robbery.

**Guest** · 09-20-2008, 08:46 AM

JMM got robbed by the purse of 30k, but his team were willing accomplices in that robbery.

**Ryn0** · 09-20-2008, 08:49 AM

If anyone actually watched the fight instead of pretending to watch it then people would know it wasn't a robbery. Marquez was beaten abeit it was close. Marquez didn't help by low blowing him in which it WAS a low blow (the 2nd one the first one was a little suspect)

NONe of the judges were from Indonesia all were appointed by the govening body and two of the major westeners that havew watched the first saw Chris John winning.

http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...anuel-marquez/

^ the only westerner at the fight both a writer for the sweet science and a ring magazine editor saw it in favour of John,

http://www.fightreport.net/?p=485

One of the other westerner's who watch the tape of the fight had John winning after the deductions otherwise it would have been a draw

**Geogoreya** · 09-20-2008, 08:49 AM

i wish i have, so i can show it too you.

**Ryn0** · 09-20-2008, 08:52 AM

I was AT the fight, John won. It was a pretty decent fight tbh but anyone claiming robbery is either a Marquez fan or hasn't seen the fight and is going off the idea that if a fight isn't held in America and the American loses then it's a robbery.

**Silencers** · 09-20-2008, 08:53 AM

Originally posted by Ryn0

If anyone actually watched the fight instead of pretending to watch it then people would know it wasn't a robbery. Marquez was beaten abeit it was close. Marquez didn't help by low blowing him in which it WAS a low blow (the 2nd one the first one was a little suspect)

NONe of the judges were from Indonesia all were appointed by the govening body and two of the major westeners that havew watched the first saw Chris John winning.

http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...anuel-marquez/

^ the only westerner at the fight both a writer for the sweet science and a ring magazine editor saw it in favour of John,

http://www.fightreport.net/?p=485

One of the other westerner's who watch the tape of the fight had John winning after the deductions otherwise it would have been a draw

I'm pretty sure ESPN scored it for John as well.

CJ vs JMM is not a robbery!!