Originally posted by grayfist
Hagler left boxing after a defeat, and so did Naz. The difference between the two is that Hagler's exit came after a controversial loss (many, very many, thought and still think he beat Leonard); Hamed's, after a beating in the hands of Barrera. Naz was exciting; he went against the grain, was unpredictable and tried to re-write the book-- he threw punches that defied general conceptions of how punches should be thrown, took defensive moves that appaled trainers, etc. His great reflexes and talent allowed him to "experiment" and succeed; his successes fed his ego and made him the type of character he was, off and on the ring. Does the already exciting featherweight division need a character like Naz? I don't think it NEEDS Naz. But if Hamed comes out to play, it would have some use for him, provided that the Naz that emerges from his hole is hale,hearty and with well-honed skills; eager to prove his worth by engaging credible opposition before meeting the division's elite; not necessarily in his first outing, but, sometime before he goes up to challenge a Morales, a Barrera or a Pacquiao. Same thing if he comes out to fight at any other weight class. He should prove that what he shall bring to the big fights is beyond pre-fight and post-fight showbiz. Caveat: More often than not, come-backing fighters do not live up to fans' expectations. In Naz case, all we could be getting from the re-emergent Naz may be the the over-the-ring-ropes flip of an entrance.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"I know the saying, 'DON'T NOT FALL IN LOVE WITH A FIGHTER. HE'LL BREAK YOUR HEART...' but I'm too dumb to follow it."-- Jim Jacob quoted by THE RING.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"I know the saying, 'DON'T NOT FALL IN LOVE WITH A FIGHTER. HE'LL BREAK YOUR HEART...' but I'm too dumb to follow it."-- Jim Jacob quoted by THE RING.

Exactly.

Comment