Pavlik Or Kessler!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #11
    The thread asks who is the better boxer.

    Kessler by quite a margin.

    Comment

    • Ryn0
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2007
      • 11139
      • 310
      • 269
      • 20,767

      #12
      Originally posted by boxasmash
      prove it.

      you can't. just because kelly is more offensive and actually goes for the ko more doesnt mean he hits harder, especially at 168+. pavlik seemed to lose his pop against taylor @ 164 and failed to ko him or even come close.

      kessler is a counter puncher, a boxer puncher if you like and doesnt rely on his punch to win fights. just because lockett a natural 154 lbs bum got stopped in 3 rounds it doesnt make pavlik hit hard.
      I can't prove it and that's the point. I have to go by what they give me, Kessler has big power but doesn't knock out as many people maybe because he's not as aggresive. Pavlik is more aggresive and has big power and knock people out. I have to go by what I see I can't go making up hypothetical theories like IF Kessler were aggresive then he'd KO more people. SO from what i've seen Pavlik hits harder. When he fights at 168 and doesn't KO people then I will change my analysis but from what I can see so far Pavlik hits harder.

      Comment

      • krispy kreme
        Fiendin for toilet water
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 10832
        • 358
        • 898
        • 18,913

        #13
        Originally posted by boxasmash
        prove it.

        you can't. just because kelly is more offensive and actually goes for the ko more doesnt mean he hits harder, especially at 168+. pavlik seemed to lose his pop against taylor @ 164 and failed to ko him or even come close.

        kessler is a counter puncher, a boxer puncher if you like and doesnt rely on his punch to win fights. just because lockett a natural 154 lbs bum got stopped in 3 rounds it doesnt make pavlik hit hard.
        He didn't KO Taylor the second time, because Taylor didn't go to the ropes.

        Comment

        • wayno
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 462
          • 23
          • 0
          • 527

          #14
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          The thread asks who is the better boxer.

          Kessler by quite a margin.
          id have to agree.

          Comment

          • Silencers
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 21957
            • 505
            • 235
            • 32,983

            #15
            Kessler is the better technically of the two.

            Comment

            • boxasmash
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 7039
              • 222
              • 63
              • 14,591

              #16
              but then again, who is technically better than kessler if anyone?

              he is textbook everything, a bigger JMM but less agressive imo

              Comment

              • abadger
                Real Talk
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 6259
                • 242
                • 139
                • 13,256

                #17
                Kessler is the better boxer, the power issue is basically unknown. Both guys have scored impressive KOs and both have gone the distance. Kessler is also the better athlete in terms of speed and agility, Pavlik probably has the advantage in stamina.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP