Is there a need for Forrest/Mora III?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hitman18
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jul 2006
    • 821
    • 61
    • 35
    • 7,258

    #11
    Just a thought, does anyone remember that Mora was weight drained? He did have to lose 2 pounds in an hour to make weight.

    Comment

    • jmmfan
      Interim Champion
      • Aug 2008
      • 724
      • 45
      • 120
      • 6,894

      #12
      Forrest was noticably distracted in their first fight, but the second time around he wasn't and showed that Mora isn't near his level. A trilogy would be pointless and a waste of a fight for Forrest. He's not getting any younger.

      So, no.

      Comment

      • The Gray Fox
        The Hotstepper
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 332
        • 21
        • 3
        • 6,511

        #13
        Originally posted by 2501 v2.0
        Mora was able to slide with a win against a visibly different Forrest in their first fight. Forrest came back looking healthy and alive in the second punishing Mora even taking him down once. Was the rematch the indicator of who is the best fighter? Or should there be a rubber match to settle it?
        Nooo way. Mora got lucky the first time. Vernon has bigger fish to fry.

        Comment

        • Chuckguy
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 13927
          • 345
          • 183
          • 58,389

          #14
          Let Mora redeem himself
          He is after all "The Contender"
          Oscar actually stating he had interest in fighting Mora with a straigh face
          LMAO wait that is a scary thought to think someone could actually do that.
          I voted yes just to be a jack ass

          but in reality
          HELL NO!!!!!

          Comment

          • Sin City
            la mala vida
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 27551
            • 1,757
            • 2,208
            • 47,596

            #15
            after the first borefest I didn't bother watching the second and will not watch a third if there is one.

            Comment

            • KnockoutTheFat
              Beer Spokesman
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 5130
              • 220
              • 221
              • 12,177

              #16
              Originally posted by 2501 v2.0
              The difference in these fights is that Quintana schooled Williams in their first, Mora barely edged out a win against Forrest.
              I wouldn't say barely. Mora won the fight 8-4 on my scorecard. But the point of all of this is that if Forrest is allowed to have an off night, than Paul Williams is. If he's not, then P-Will isn't, then they both need a third match. I'd love to see Mora get KO'ed by a natural WW.

              Comment

              • BlackHat
                milking the cashcow
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 2852
                • 79
                • 136
                • 9,569

                #17
                Forrest - JMM!!!

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Ultimateboxa
                  If you think there's a need for Quintana-Williams III then there's a need for Forrest-Mora III. Actually if you think about it, Williams should fight Quintana again anyway since nobody else wants to fight him.
                  there is no need for williams/quintana III or forrest/mora III.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP