Pac also fought Barrera back in 2003 when he was 29 and widely considered king of the featherweights. I think his point was that JMM has yet to really officially defeat marquee names near or in their prime.
So then what you are saying is that Pac decided to rematch someone he EASILY disposed of years later after he grew even older? So how is Marquez fighting Barrera worse than Pac rematching Barrera? Again, I'm going by your homeboy's logic.
So then what you are saying is that Pac decided to rematch someone he EASILY disposed of years later after he grew even older? So how is Marquez fighting Barrera worse than Pac rematching Barrera? Again, I'm going by your homeboy's logic.
The logic was right there in my post. It's pretty simple to comprehend. JMM has only oldies for marquee victims. At least Pac can show top names who were 30 yrs old or younger when he beat them.
The logic was right there in my post. It's pretty simple to comprehend. JMM has only oldies for marquee victims. At least Pac can show top names who were 30 yrs old or younger when he beat them.
The logic was right there in my post. It's pretty simple to comprehend. JMM has only oldies for marquee victims. At least Pac can show top names who were 30 yrs old or younger when he beat them.
But Pac is not Mexican, put that in your pipe and smoke it.
If Katsidis face got mutilated by a non power punching Diaz, I could only imagine the type of free plastic surgery Pac would have preformed on Katsidis. Kat's camp should never let him in the ring with Pac because it would truly be a case of Kat coming into the ring looking one way and leaving looking another way permanently.
katsidis lost 2 fights in a row... no way he deserves to fight pac
Tweet
Comment