Which of these statements is more likely to be FALSE?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • badboypeenoy
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 3203
    • 54
    • 44
    • 9,669

    #1

    Which of these statements is more likely to be FALSE?

    1. Juan Manuel Marquez should be number 2 pound for pound.
    2. Calzaghe is an all-time-great.
    3. Kessler is in the current top 20 pound for pound.
    4. Guzman is unprofessional.
    51
    JMM should be pound for pound #2
    21.57%
    11
    Calzaghe is an all-time-great
    56.86%
    29
    Kessler is within the current top current top #20 P4P
    11.76%
    6
    Guzman is unprofessional
    9.80%
    5
  • sugarshanenas
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 1273
    • 45
    • 50
    • 7,708

    #2
    the calzaghe one

    Comment

    • badboypeenoy
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 3203
      • 54
      • 44
      • 9,669

      #3
      Originally posted by sugarshanenas
      the calzaghe one
      damn...is this poll THAT easy? How can I change that option to "hall of fame shoo-in?"

      Comment

      • -Swizzy-
        The Wolf
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 8821
        • 431
        • 330
        • 661,075

        #4
        The Kessler one. No way kessler is top 20 p4p right now. He has done nothing his whole career....NOTHING. Stepping into the ring with calzaghe doesn't count cuz it wasn't a win.

        The Calzaghe ATG option is a VERY close 2nd. Cuz Calzaghe's best win is against Kessler so, ipso facto, Calzaghe shouldn't be ATG.
        Last edited by -Swizzy-; 09-15-2008, 11:20 PM.

        Comment

        • badboypeenoy
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 3203
          • 54
          • 44
          • 9,669

          #5
          Originally posted by kswizzy99
          The Kessler one. No way kessler is top 20 p4p right now. He has done nothing his whole career....NOTHING. Stepping into the ring with calzaghe doesn't count cuz it wasn't a win.

          The Calzaghe ATG option is a VERY close 2nd. Cuz Calzaghe's best win is against Kessler so, ipso facto, Calzaghe shouldn't be ATG.
          Symbiotic relationship. Calzaghe feeds off Kessler's worth as a fighter and vice versa.

          Comment

          • badboypeenoy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 3203
            • 54
            • 44
            • 9,669

            #6
            ouch Joe!... people would more likely believe Kessler's in the top 20 P4P than believe you're an all-time-great.

            Comment

            • Joe2608
              The Red Devils
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 7753
              • 120
              • 108
              • 14,691

              #7
              Calzaghe isn't an all time great, he is a great in his own division but not in the whole of boxing (if that makes any sense)

              I also think JMM isn't P4P #2, people have really overeacted to him beating a pretty much shot Casamayor. He is #3 but it's still Calzaghe #2 and Pac #1 for me.

              Comment

              • abadger
                Real Talk
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 6259
                • 242
                • 139
                • 13,256

                #8
                Ridiculous post. You are an idiot.

                Comment

                • -Swizzy-
                  The Wolf
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 8821
                  • 431
                  • 330
                  • 661,075

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Joe2608
                  Calzaghe isn't an all time great, he is a great in his own division but not in the whole of boxing (if that makes any sense)

                  I also think JMM isn't P4P #2, people have really overeacted to him beating a pretty much shot Casamayor. He is #3 but it's still Calzaghe #2 and Pac #1 for me.
                  JMM's win over Casamayor is better than Calzaghe's win over Hopkins. That is why he should be above Calzaghe.

                  Comment

                  • SkillspayBills
                    Garlic Butter Gang!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 29181
                    • 2,155
                    • 3,739
                    • 61,188

                    #10
                    **** I meant to vote for the Calzaghe one. He is a HOF, but not an ATG. OK

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP