i watched pernell"pete"whitakers ringside

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • larryx
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 13892
    • 225
    • 108
    • 15,442

    #1

    i watched pernell"pete"whitakers ringside

    and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands down
  • T-97
    BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 14808
    • 566
    • 628
    • 22,958

    #2
    Originally posted by larryx
    and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands down
    Wow.................

    Comment

    • larryx
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 13892
      • 225
      • 108
      • 15,442

      #3
      Originally posted by T-97
      Wow.................
      sorry but its the truth!!!dont get me wrong the man was great but floyd is 1 of a kind

      Comment

      • T-97
        BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 14808
        • 566
        • 628
        • 22,958

        #4
        Originally posted by larryx
        sorry but its the truth!!!
        Wow...........

        Comment

        • El Dominicano
          Banned
          • Aug 2007
          • 10074
          • 226
          • 49
          • 10,758

          #5
          Originally posted by larryx
          and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands down
          Gotta disagree. Pernell Whitaker is better then Floyd at alot of things and Floyd has a few things better then him. I'll revive the thread.

          Comment

          • AntonTheMeh
            STOP CRYIN
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 21222
            • 700
            • 709
            • 31,623

            #6
            he was a bit slower, he was still better.

            Comment

            • larryx
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 13892
              • 225
              • 108
              • 15,442

              #7
              Originally posted by ALPHA O`MEGA
              he was a bit slower, he was still better.
              old school fighters always get the nod it seems!!!! floyd wont get his credit until 10 years down the line i guess

              Comment

              • Hagler★
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 2338
                • 168
                • 342
                • 9,745

                #8
                Originally posted by larryx
                and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands down
                we cant take you seriously with PBF in your sig and avatar

                Comment

                • El Dominicano
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 10074
                  • 226
                  • 49
                  • 10,758

                  #9
                  Originally posted by larryx
                  old school fighters always get the nod it seems!!!! floyd wont get his credit until 10 years down the line i guess
                  Floyd had more power, speed, better ability to fight with his back against the rope

                  Pernell better jab, accuracy, body puncher, threw better combinations,


                  Footwork: Same
                  Chin: Same
                  Overall Defense: Same
                  Stamina: I'm NOW gonna say the same cuz Pernell was more active and Floyd didn't get tired. Its NOW that I've come up with this one.

                  They are both capable of beating eachother and I would know who to lean towards.

                  Comment

                  • Silencers
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 21957
                    • 505
                    • 235
                    • 32,983

                    #10
                    Whitaker, pound for pound is better than Mayweather.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP