and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands down
i watched pernell"pete"whitakers ringside
Collapse
-
Wow.................and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands down -
Gotta disagree. Pernell Whitaker is better then Floyd at alot of things and Floyd has a few things better then him. I'll revive the thread.and he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands downComment
-
-
we cant take you seriously with PBF in your sig and avatarand he was a great fighter but im sorry he was not better than floyd!!!!!!!!! he had great defense but was a step slower than floyd he was willing to mix it up more maybe but floyd hit twice as hard as him!!! but in his era he was the best but h2h floyd beats him hands downComment
-
Floyd had more power, speed, better ability to fight with his back against the rope
Pernell better jab, accuracy, body puncher, threw better combinations,
Footwork: Same
Chin: Same
Overall Defense: Same
Stamina: I'm NOW gonna say the same cuz Pernell was more active and Floyd didn't get tired. Its NOW that I've come up with this one.
They are both capable of beating eachother and I would know who to lean towards.Comment
Comment