Trilogies? Do they help or hurt fighters careers?

[FRANKGWJ]

trilogies are good but I just don't like them back to back.

Why not? I love when the rematches come back to back

[FRANKGWJ]

B-Hop

Have Benard been in a trilogy?

[TheGreatA]

Have Benard been in a trilogy?

Hopkins?

He had a trilogy with Robert Allen...
The first fight was a no contest when the referee pushed Hopkins out of the ring and injured him, the second fight was a TKO win by Hopkins, the third fight 6 years later was a UD win by Hopkins.

[FRANKGWJ]

Cotto and Tony will be the next trilogy!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Pullcounter]

One of the first trilogy fights happend between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frasier. In my opinon neither fighter was the same after their trilogy. Erick Morales and Marco Antonio Barrera neither fighter was the same after their trilogy. Evander Holyfield and Rid**** Bowe, Arterio Gatti and Mickey Ward the same outcome as the fights listed above "Neither fighter was the same after the trilogy"
What happends after the third fight? Can you name a fighter who has had a successful career after a trilogy?



Side question: Would a trilogy be good between Pacquaio and Juan Manuel Marquez, Cotto and Margarito?

trilogies hurt when the fights are back to back.

[Pullcounter]

Cotto and Tony will be the next trilogy!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah, but that would mean cotto has to win big in the rematch.

[FloydsEra]

Cotto and Tony will be the next trilogy!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If that happens Cotto willl end up beiing shot at a very young age, that is, if Cotto takes nearly as much damage in the rematches as he did in the original.