So if Nate loses should the titles be vacant??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ANDROID_DOES
    What Apple CANT!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 10265
    • 459
    • 205
    • 17,529

    #1

    So if Nate loses should the titles be vacant??

    I don't know what the F guzman was thinking, how can YOU NOT make weight for this fight?? I would like to see the belts vacant if Nate lose then have a fight for them. But then if you think about it and if your nate supporter i guess you can say well he fought a guy that weighed more than him so it wasnt fair. I don't know **** guzman what an idiot.
  • T-97
    BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 14808
    • 566
    • 628
    • 22,958

    #2
    Nah, Guzman isn't a lightweight. So Nate wouldn't have lost to a lightweight, more like a Jr WW..

    Comment

    • Silencers
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 21957
      • 505
      • 235
      • 32,983

      #3
      It's officially a non-title fight so no.

      Comment

      • ANDROID_DOES
        What Apple CANT!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 10265
        • 459
        • 205
        • 17,529

        #4
        this was the only fight that i was going to consider watching over the fresno state vs wisconson game. Forget it now im watching the game!!!

        Comment

        • neils7147933
          Boxingscene Icon
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 16261
          • 946
          • 2,279
          • 26,752

          #5
          You can't penalize a fighter following the rules for losing to someone who didn't...

          Comment

          • Zocalo
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 2169
            • 51
            • 144
            • 8,453

            #6
            Originally posted by neils7147933
            You can't penalize a fighter following the rules for losing to someone who didn't...
            Exactly.... Campbell made weight, so why should he be punished?

            Comment

            • ANDROID_DOES
              What Apple CANT!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 10265
              • 459
              • 205
              • 17,529

              #7
              Originally posted by Zocalo
              Exactly.... Campbell made weight, so why should he be punished?
              I understand that and i mentioned that. Still a ****ed up situation. Go FRESNO STATE!

              Comment

              • Sox8055
                *PLAYBOY*
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 6229
                • 206
                • 279
                • 13,599

                #8
                I dont think so, it would be better for him to give a rematch to diaz....since those were his..belts..

                Comment

                • warp1432
                  the mailman
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 14406
                  • 478
                  • 347
                  • 24,060

                  #9
                  They'll probably just have a rematch if Guzman wins would be my guess.

                  Comment

                  • Hard Dick
                    Up and Cummer
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 3065
                    • 1,494
                    • 971
                    • 10,306

                    #10
                    It becomes a ten rounder non title fight, if Nate loses he's still champ as he did not lose to a fighter in his weight class.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP