So if Nate loses should the titles be vacant??

[ANDROID_DOES]

I don't know what the F guzman was thinking, how can YOU NOT make weight for this fight?? I would like to see the belts vacant if Nate lose then have a fight for them. But then if you think about it and if your nate supporter i guess you can say well he fought a guy that weighed more than him so it wasnt fair. I don't know **** guzman what an idiot.

[T-97]

Nah, Guzman isn't a lightweight. So Nate wouldn't have lost to a lightweight, more like a Jr WW..

[Silencers]

It's officially a non-title fight so no.

[ANDROID_DOES]

this was the only fight that i was going to consider watching over the fresno state vs wisconson game. Forget it now im watching the game!!!

[neils7147933]

You can't penalize a fighter following the rules for losing to someone who didn't...

[Zocalo]

You can't penalize a fighter following the rules for losing to someone who didn't...

Exactly.... Campbell made weight, so why should he be punished?

[ANDROID_DOES]

Exactly.... Campbell made weight, so why should he be punished?

I understand that and i mentioned that. Still a ****ed up situation. Go FRESNO STATE!

[Sox8055]

I dont think so, it would be better for him to give a rematch to diaz....since those were his..belts..

[warp1432]

They'll probably just have a rematch if Guzman wins would be my guess.

[Hard Dick]

It becomes a ten rounder non title fight, if Nate loses he's still champ as he did not lose to a fighter in his weight class.