Why does TheRing have Hopkins as #4 p4p but Calderon not in the top 10?

[βetamax]

So you're saying it's okay for young men to mug old ladies and steal their purses?

I disagree. Anyone who does that is a scumbag.

No, I didn't say that. Your putting words in my mouth.

I guess you can't comprehend that people make mistakes when they're younger, especially those are more easily set up to do so.

[¡VIVA MEXICO!]

It's seems unfair to me the the Ring Magazine has old Bernard "One Punch & Hold" Hopkins as #4 on their p4p list, but a slick, quick fighter like Ivan Calderon has been left off.

Hopkins has no world titles, while Calderon is the champion at Light Flyweight.

Hopkins has lost THREE of his past FIVE. Calderon is undefeated in his career, with many successful world title defenses at strawweight and light flyweight!

Is this fair?

i also myself this question everyday. this is a great thread. hopkins is old and he has been a garbage fighter for a few years now.

[Pullcounter]

It's seems unfair to me the the Ring Magazine has old Bernard "One Punch & Hold" Hopkins as #4 on their p4p list, but a slick, quick fighter like Ivan Calderon has been left off.

Hopkins has no world titles, while Calderon is the champion at Light Flyweight.

Hopkins has lost THREE of his past FIVE. Calderon is undefeated in his career, with many successful world title defenses at strawweight and light flyweight!

Is this fair?

GBP owns the RING.