Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why isn't nate Campbell making a bigger stink?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why isn't nate Campbell making a bigger stink?

    He hold three of the 4 belts and the other belt is currently held by PACMAN....Why isn't he making a bigger stink about the fight between PACMAN and DLH? I truely think the boxing world should cry out against these Chamos moving up in weight to fight bigger oppoenents for money if they have belts. In my book they should have to vacate the belt before moving up to fight a bigger opponent. Then have a title elimination mtach or tourney in that divivsion and give some of these younger guys and more hungry guys an opportunity to make some money nad entertain the public.....Lefty

  • #2
    Originally posted by luckylefty731 View Post
    He hold three of the 4 belts and the other belt is currently held by PACMAN....Why isn't he making a bigger stink about the fight between PACMAN and DLH? I truely think the boxing world should cry out against these Chamos moving up in weight to fight bigger oppoenents for money if they have belts. In my book they should have to vacate the belt before moving up to fight a bigger opponent. Then have a title elimination mtach or tourney in that divivsion and give some of these younger guys and more hungry guys an opportunity to make some money nad entertain the public.....Lefty
    Whats the point though?
    It aint like Hoya or anyone will listen...
    Plus everyone else is kicking up a stink Nate dont have to..
    Its obvious how peeps feel about it....
    Last edited by The Gully Gad; 09-03-2008, 11:24 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think he's just focusing on Guzman right now but I would think he'd say something about it after the fight if he wins.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm sure he talks about it, but it isn't reported. Everything you read about is decided on.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Silencers View Post
          I think he's just focusing on Guzman right now but I would think he'd say something about it after the fight if he wins.


          co-sign...aside his own words-battle with his opponent, he has to get himself 100% as this will not be a walk in the park

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by luckylefty731 View Post
            He hold three of the 4 belts and the other belt is currently held by PACMAN....Why isn't he making a bigger stink about the fight between PACMAN and DLH? I truely think the boxing world should cry out against these Chamos moving up in weight to fight bigger oppoenents for money if they have belts. In my book they should have to vacate the belt before moving up to fight a bigger opponent. Then have a title elimination mtach or tourney in that divivsion and give some of these younger guys and more hungry guys an opportunity to make some money nad entertain the public.....Lefty
            why vacate the belt? as long as he immediately goes back down and defends his belt I have no problem with it. I say fighters should even be allowed to hold belts in multiple weight divisions at the same time as long as they defend each of those belts on a regular basis. henry armstrong held belts in 4 different weight classes at the same time.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
              why vacate the belt? as long as he immediately goes back down and defends his belt I have no problem with it. I say fighters should even be allowed to hold belts in multiple weight divisions at the same time as long as they defend each of those belts on a regular basis. henry armstrong held belts in 4 different weight classes at the same time.
              i think you should be limited to one fight at a different weight and then have to decide to defend your belt again, so pac should have to put his lightweight belts on the line after dlh or give them up, as much as i would like to see hatton - paq it wouldnt be fair for him to keep his lightweight belts unless he would defend them after dlh if that makes any sense

              basically you can venture to a different weight but if you decide to take multiple fights at that weight you have to make the move more permanent

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
                why vacate the belt? as long as he immediately goes back down and defends his belt I have no problem with it. I say fighters should even be allowed to hold belts in multiple weight divisions at the same time as long as they defend each of those belts on a regular basis. henry armstrong held belts in 4 different weight classes at the same time.
                have PACMAN fluctuate between 130 and 147 go up 17 and down 17 can't be too healthy...I can see this happening from 140 to 147 or 147 to 154 but two weight classes back and forth like I sad can't be too healthy.....Lefty

                Comment


                • #9
                  Guzman will win and then he will call out Pac, but no one would care because they will all be in love with the idea of the Pac-DLH fight.

                  WAR GUZMAN!!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP