Originally posted by Clegg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How did you Calzaghe fans feel when B-Hop knock him down in round 1??
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Stickman View PostAdelaide Byrd was the sole source of dissention in that decision, the other two cards had Zaggs comfortably ahead. If you're using that crazy ***** as an anchoring point to imply that Hopkins might've really won......
Technically, though, you're 100% right, it was a split decision.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mt102879 View PostComfortably ahead is 114-113 for Calzaghe?
Anyway, my point was that Byrdwoman has had several questionable decisions, so using her as the rallying point for those who thought Hopkins won....not really solid ground for an argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DanielTurcotte3 View PostRoy was attempting to throw his own left hook which didn't help the fact that he didn't see it coming even more so. Also Roy is known for throwing things like a lead left hook rather then a jab, simply becuase its harder to counter a left hook then a jab. On this night that didnt work. I wont call it a lucky punch, any punch that is thrown with that kinda intent is meant to land, just the way it did with Tarver, but ur def right, he did in fact have his eyes closed.
And believe me, a head and a hard surface like cement and a ring canvas for that matter, which has absolutely no give whatsoever and not meant for each other. Further more so when u have no ability to brace yourself like in which Roy had none of in falling to the canvas after the right hand from Johnson.
I had no time to brace myself, it was head and concrete, concrete won in a bad way, I spent 2 nights in the hospital and suffered from cold sweats for a few days during which I would wake while sleeping. The head is not meant to hit such hard surfaces such as these. Point Blank!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickman View PostI thought the other two cards were a couple points difference? I remember 115/112, maybe I'm just not remembering it right.
Anyway, my point was that Byrdwoman has had several questionable decisions, so using her as the rallying point for those who thought Hopkins won....not really solid ground for an argument.
There were media sources ringside (ESPN, Yahoo, and the AP)who scored it for Hopkins among others. So I wouldn't call Byrd's scoring outrageous or anything. I thought Giampa's 116-112 was more worthy of being a called a poor scoring decision.Last edited by βetamax; 09-03-2008, 12:51 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickman View PostI thought the other two cards were a couple points difference? I remember 115/112, maybe I'm just not remembering it right.
Anyway, my point was that Byrdwoman has had several questionable decisions, so using her as the rallying point for those who thought Hopkins won....not really solid ground for an argument.
The scores should've been unanimous in JC's favor since he clearly won 8 rounds.
The official scores were, Ted Gimza 115-112, Adalaide Byrd 113-114, Chuck Giampa 116-111
Comment
-
When Calzaghe went down in the first round obviously everyone following him was worried but these things happen and he showed what he was worth by turning it around and winning the fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mayfeather View PostWhen Calzaghe went down in the first round obviously everyone following him was worried but these things happen and he showed what he was worth by turning it around and winning the fight
Comment
Comment