according to this forum every great fighter

[larryx]

from this era is overated
floyd mayweather-6 time champ undefeated
james toney-old school throw back won titles from middle-to heavy-he beat ruiz
b-hop-20 title defenses cleaned out the middle weight divivsion
joe calzaghe-21 title defenses-cleaned out suppermiddle
these names are not overated [please learn the definition of overated because you make youself look dumb]

[Left Hook Tua]

from this era is overated
floyd mayweather-6 time champ undefeated
james toney-old school throw back won titles from middle-to heavy-he beat ruiz
b-hop-20 title defenses cleaned out the middle weight divivsion
joe calzaghe-21 title defenses-cleaned out suppermiddle
these names are not overated [please learn the definition of overated because you make youself look dumb]

any fighter can be overrated or underrated according to who's doing the rating.

example if you say floyd is greater than sugar ray robinson then you're overrating floyd.

if you say bernard is greater than hagler or monzon you're overrating him.

if you say joe would beat a prime roy or toney at 168 you're definitely overrating him.

[Dan...]

Agreed. Its a joke that ppl throw some of these guys names around as being overrated or even bums. People show their lack of intellect when they do this. Calzaghe is probably the biggest example I think.

[larryx]

any fighter can be overrated or underrated according to who's doing the rating.

example if you say floyd is greater than sugar ray robinson then you're overrating floyd.

if you say bernard is greater than hagler or monzon you're overrating him.

if you say joe would beat a prime roy or toney at 168 you're definitely overrating him.

see thats another one just because fighters fought in the past doesnt make them better..people act like its a joke to say a present fighter beats an old school fighter//but no joe wouldnt beat a prime roy of toney and floyd is to small for robinson,but hagler and hopkins is a toss up prime for prime