The Greatest Fighter of all time?

[mrpain81]

It's not a fight because there is no transitioning or ground work. Which is why in a REAL FIGHT a boxer would have lots of problems with somebody who can utilize his elbows, knees, feet, wrestling, judo, sambo, BJJ, etc. and is trained to do so. Go back into your hole now that's enough punishment for you tonight. Try training sometime buzzard.

You just keep proving you're self you to be a bias ass clown.

Stick to sherdog and you're bull**** "real fight" crap, nobody gives a **** but you.

Thanks for letting us know what a real fight and fighter is though, I'll let Roberto Duran know he wasn't a real fighter because he didn't know what a toe hold was.

[sugarshanenas]

lol,mma........

[Silencers]

Ray Robinson.

[Luciano]

You just keep proving you're self you to be a bias ass clown.

Stick to sherdog and you're bull**** "real fight" crap, nobody gives a **** but you.

Thanks for letting us know what a real fight and fighter is though, I'll let Roberto Duran know he wasn't a real fighter because he didn't know what a toe hold was.

A toe hold?? An elite muay thai guy would KTFO any boxer in a fight. Sure theres always a chance a boxer lands a shot, but when you can punch, kick, elbow, knee, wrestle, use judo, submissions, chokes, break legs, arms, hands, feet, ankles. pound heads through the ground while on top, do submissions off your back on the ground, i think that says it all.

Obviously you give a ****, which is why you keep hurtin yourself. MMA=FIGHTERS BOXERS=BOXERS

[mrpain81]

A toe hold?? An elite muay thai guy would KTFO any boxer in a fight. Sure theres always a chance a boxer lands a shot, but when you can punch, kick, elbow, knee, wrestle, use judo, submissions, chokes, break legs, arms, hands, feet, ankles. pound heads through the ground while on top, do submissions off your back on the ground, i think that says it all.

Obviously you give a ****, which is why you keep hurtin yourself. MMA=FIGHTERS BOXERS=BOXERS

LMAO

Get over it, this is a boxing forum and you're opinion means ****

Back to sherdog.....

[Luciano]

LMAO

Get over it, this is a boxing forum and you're opinion means ****

Back to sherdog.....

It's YOUR. Not you're. You are opinions mean ****?? You know you're stands for you are right?? I normally don't correct people but, HOW MANY ****IN TIMES CAN ONE GUY DO THAT??? Every ****in post?? It's like it's a ****in inside joke with you or something.

Anyways, the point I proved was right. You were wrong. Grasp on to whatever you want, I used logic, you used one theory (the lowblows and illegal stuff) and then basically said nothing in 5 posts. You're finished. Go back to the dressing room.

[BadNewz]

A toe hold?? An elite muay thai guy would KTFO any boxer in a fight. Sure theres always a chance a boxer lands a shot, but when you can punch, kick, elbow, knee, wrestle, use judo, submissions, chokes, break legs, arms, hands, feet, ankles. pound heads through the ground while on top, do submissions off your back on the ground, i think that says it all.

Obviously you give a ****, which is why you keep hurtin yourself. MMA=FIGHTERS BOXERS=BOXERS

If you're allowed to do more stuff of course you're going to have an advantage in a head-to-head. That means jack ****. A gunfighter would beat either a boxer or an MMA fighter in a head-to-head. That don't make gunfighting a better sport.

If the very best of today's MMA fighters had gone into boxing instead when they were young, then today they'd be mediocre boxers. If today's boxers trained as MMA fighters when they were young, they'd dominate MMA. MMA is for athletic rejects who needed to find a sport with a lower competition level cuz they couldn't cut it in a sport where elite athletes go.

[Luciano]

If you're allowed to do more stuff of course you're going to have an advantage in a head-to-head. That means jack ****. A gunfighter would beat either a boxer or an MMA fighter in a head-to-head. That don't make gunfighting a better sport.

If the very best of today's MMA fighters had gone into boxing instead when they were young, then today they'd be mediocre boxers. If today's boxers trained as MMA fighters when they were young, they'd dominate MMA. MMA is for athletic rejects who needed to find a sport with a lower competition level cuz they couldn't cut it in a sport where elite athletes go.

Hahaha that's the funniest **** I've ever read. That's why most people laugh at boxing fans. I'm talking hand to hand, foot to foot, one human vs one human, NO WEAPON fighting you idiot. Can you comprehend that?? Which "fighter" would have way more tools??

And the thing you said about athleticism is a complete joke. There's more Olympic medalists in mma then boxing you ****in clown. Judo, Wrestling, Tae Kwon Do etc. Not to mention arts like Sambo, which is the art used in the Russian military that would crush boxing, Muay thai, a form of striking that makes boxing look elementary.

For you to say some bull**** like that is ****in hilarious, about boxers being able to be top mma guys but mma guys being mediocre boxers. ******* like you should keep your opinions to yourself. Ask Freddie Roach who the best athlete he ever trained was. ANDREI ARLOVSKI. AN MMA FIGHTER. And that includes the current participants of boxings big superfight. Ignorant ****.

[mrpain81]

It's YOUR. Not you're. You are opinions mean ****?? You know you're stands for you are right?? I normally don't correct people but, HOW MANY ****IN TIMES CAN ONE GUY DO THAT??? Every ****in post?? It's like it's a ****in inside joke with you or something.

Anyways, the point I proved was right. You were wrong. Grasp on to whatever you want, I used logic, you used one theory (the lowblows and illegal stuff) and then basically said nothing in 5 posts. You're finished. Go back to the dressing room.

You proved to be a MMA troll..

like I said Back to sherdog..

[Luciano]

You proved to be a MMA troll..

like I said Back to sherdog..

An mma troll. This is the first night I've talked mma on here and I've been here since December. Go back to your 14 year old kid replies because to anybody who is a fan of both or not biased they would laugh at your side of the debate and how funny it is watching you pretend to be intellectually inclinced, when analytically you're as pale as the guy in your av.