I agree for the most part. I mean some here can really go into detail about Mayweather but once it involves other aspects such as comparision to other fighters they tend to lose steam such as saying the writer has a case because Manny fought the same Mexican for his entire career.
Manny Pacquiao: Has He Sold Out ? and Is He Really The Best Pound For Pound?
Collapse
-
a big LOL. pac has been the one who moved up in weight all the time. after beating the best at 122, he moved up and took on the best at 126 in marco and beat him to a pulp. how can u complain? faced jmm a couple fights later and move up to 130 to face the bigger EM. who else did that, took on the 3 best in those division in more than a year only? and at 135, took on the bulkier and bigger diaz.
the only ones i see agreeing w/ this article are pbf nuthuggers and xcaret, mayansun and ferocity
Don't you get it? To be properly accredited one MUST beat a Black or an american.
Doesn't matter if they have qualified fighters in the division or not.
You just HAVE to.Comment
-
it must be stated, has beaten no top American fighters and has squared off with no pure boxers; in particular, "Black" fighters--Latin, African, or American. Names that immediately come to mind are Joan Guzman, Nate Campbell, Joel Casamayor, Zahir RaheemComment
-
U LEFT OFF THIS PART
it must be stated, has beaten no top American fighters and has squared off with no pure boxers; in particular, "Black" fighters--Latin, African, or American. Names that immediately come to mind are Joan Guzman, Nate Campbell, Joel Casamayor, Zahir Raheem
Black generally encompasses all ethnicities if there isn't one listed.
Water on the head
grow a brain.
btw, is Floyd ever going to fight a prime welter? Or are you going to continue to base his p4p standing on what he did in 2003?Comment
-
The problem is that this thread is made by you. Let me repeat that, this thread is made by you. I am more than confident that you are a Floyd Mayweather fan or that he is your favorite fighter. So for you to make a thread where you agree that Pacquiao has only faced certain fighters because it was a more lucrative or easier path and criticize him for doing so, well, that would be like a Catholic Priest preaching against ******ing children. You are in no position to fee like your opinion will be considered when you wont admit to your favorite fighters most unpopular decisions.Comment
-
a Big Lol. Pac Has Been The One Who Moved Up In Weight All The Time. After Beating The Best At 122, He Moved Up And Took On The Best At 126 In Marco And Beat Him To A Pulp. How Can U Complain? Faced Jmm A Couple Fights Later And Move Up To 130 To Face The Bigger Em. Who Else Did That, Took On The 3 Best In Those Division In More Than A Year Only? And At 135, Took On The Bulkier And Bigger Diaz.
The Only Ones I See Agreeing W/ This Article Are Pbf Nuthuggers And Xcaret, Mayansun And FerocityComment
-
Pacman Could Have Fought Raheem Instead Fighting Morales For The 2nd Time, But He Wanted To Get Revenge. Cool, I'm Ok With That. Instead Of Fighting Morales For Third Time, He Could Fought Guzman. The Barrera Rematch Shouldn't Have Happened. He Should Have Fought Jmm At That Time.
And I Believe This Article Was About Manny And His Greatness, Not Floyd. There Are Plenty Of Articles Criticizing And Defending Floyd's P4p Status. Not So Many For Pacman
raheem was at 135 you ****ing moron. he didn't jump to 135 'til 3 months ago.
barrera and later marquez had the wbc belt at 130. what ****ing belt did zahir have?
so instead of staying at 130 waiting for a chance at the 130 belt you want him to go after zahir for no belt?
the money is in fighting erik , marco and juan. the prestige is in fighting erik , marco and juan. the interest (fan wise) is in fighting erik , marco and juan.
why the hell would he fight a nobody like zahir raheem?Comment
-
you really REAAAAAALLLY think Manny was going to fight Raheem instead Erik?
Instead Of Fighting Morales For Third Time, He Could Fought Guzman.
The Barrera Rematch Shouldn't Have Happened. He Should Have Fought Jmm At That Time.
And I Believe This Article Was About Manny And His Greatness, Not Floyd. There Are Plenty Of Articles Criticizing And Defending Floyd's P4p Status. Not So Many For Pacman
but who was the #1 beforehand? So can't we use Mr Mayweather in comparison considering he was Manny's predecessor? I mean didn't we do that to Mayweather IN COMPARISON to Hopkins? didn't we question Hopkins run of middleweight nobodies post Tito?
cmon man I got to believe you are better than this.Comment
-
Didn't He Weigh More Than All Of Them On The Night Of The Fight. Just Because He Moved Up In Weight Doesn't Mean He Was The Smaller Man Or Else Oscar Would Have Been The Smaller Man In Most Of His Fights. U Really Think David Diaz Was Bigger Than Pacman...u See That Fight?
just because manny koed him doesn't mean he was the bigger man.Last edited by Left Hook Tua; 08-25-2008, 01:37 PM.Comment
-
Counterpoint1 - After the draw Marquez was offered 750,000$ for an immediate rematch with Pacman. Marquez declines to fight Chris John for 30,000 and loses his belt
Counterpoints 2,3 - The Morales loss to Raheem was at 135, and have no bearings in his performance at 130. Even in their past prime state they werent exactly shot. What other fighter besides each other would have been able to beat Barrera or Morales at 130 at the time???
The ring 130 rankings going into the Morales rubbermatch looked like this
Champipn =Barrera
1. Pacquiao
2. Morales
3. JuarezComment
Comment