Hopkins better than Hagler and Monzon?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AztecWanker
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 5331
    • 401
    • 505
    • 6,208

    #51
    for hopkins to beat those guys, he has to box the way he boxed against tito. i believe tito was undersized as all hell and the right opponent at the right time for bhop stylewise. i just dont see hopkins outboxing hagler and monzon that way, both are among the toughest men to ever lace a pair of gloves not to mention smart fighters as well. in a 15 rounder, bhop gets stopped or loses big in a 12 rounder.

    Comment

    • warp1432
      the mailman
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 14406
      • 478
      • 347
      • 24,060

      #52
      There are 5 middleweights that deserve to be higher then Bernard Hopkins:

      -Hagler
      -Greb
      -Fitzsimmons
      -Monzon
      -Keetchel

      I think Bernard would be competitive with all of them. Of course some other middles could potentially beat Hopkins too (Leonard would imo), but on a top 10 basis, he ranks 6.

      Comment

      • Left Hook Tua
        VATNIK
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 62306
        • 7,010
        • 1,581
        • 951,318

        #53
        Originally posted by Clegg
        I think she might be Samoan.
        maybe if she was 9.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP