Wlad has a bigger punch then Tyson??

[larryx]

balboa is somewhat overrated though.

he couldn't even beat a blown up , overrated light heavyweight like tarver.

his resume is world class though.

tommy morrison
antonio tarver
mr. t
hulk hogan
vitali klitschko

and ken norton ducked him.

hes all heart he beat the undisputed champ in creed and had like 10 title defenses before loosing to clubber lane aka mr t but he came back and beat him///he's like lennox lewis he beat ever oponent he fought..

[Left Hook Tua]

hes all heart he beat the undisputed champ in creed and had like 10 title defenses before loosing to clubber lane aka mr t but he came back and beat him///he's like lennox lewis he beat ever oponent he fought..

no skills though.

he makes gatti look like pernell whitaker or floyd mayweather out there.

[CottoWinsPartII]

Wlad=won 51 (KO 45) + lost 3 KO% 83.33
Tyson=won 50 (KO 44) + lost 6 KO% 75.86





Damn their current records are very close!! Wlad shows to be edging iron mike on the stats, quite impressive!!! It will also go up after Haye feels a real punch!!

It's about WHO they fought... not your little KO % game. Tyson fought MUCH better comp. and punched as hard or harder with 25 less lbs.

[Stickman]

tyson retired fighters and knocked teeth clean out their mouth at 5'10 wlad is 6'6 hes suppose to have a 100 percent ko ratio in this garbage era of heavys

Yes, yes, everybody knows that Tyson was "Thuperman".

Seriously, though, Tyson had very good power, but nothing like W. Klitchko. He's up there in that class with Foreman and Shavers, or very close to it.

[larryx]

no skills though.

he makes gatti look like pernell whitaker or floyd mayweather out there.

co-sign!!!!

[larryx]

Yes, yes, everybody knows that Tyson was "Thuperman".

Seriously, though, Tyson had very good power, but nothing like W. Klitchko. He's up there in that class with Foreman and Shavers, or very close to it.

hell no he isnt///foreman and shavers would ass **** wlad easy

[Left Hook Tua]

Yes, yes, everybody knows that Tyson was "Thuperman".

Seriously, though, Tyson had very good power, but nothing like W. Klitchko. He's up there in that class with Foreman and Shavers, or very close to it.

i don't think either tyson or wlad is on foreman and shavers level.

foreman and shavers were not the most technically correct punchers. it was just raw natural punching power.

tyson had unreal fast hands for a slugger and wlad's superior height let's them catch guys flush more frequently. both also throw their punches much more technically correct.

[YNWA]

if you measured their two punches you'd probably find the wlads hardest punch would have a lot more force behind it than tysons

however...wlad isn't exactly the most attacking of fighters and doesnt like to let his hands go whereas tyson would throw about 10 power shots a round at you from all angles so would be more likey to knock you out

i actually rate vitali's punching power as better than wlads - his more offensive style of fighting gives him excellent positions to blast people away whereas wlad always trying to work his, admittedly devestating, right hand from behind a bit of a cagey stance and approach so will always have less oppurtunity to use his power to its full potential

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

I can't believe this question is even being asked.

[Unknown Champ]

You guys sound like u need some tail lol. all emotional. Tyson fought bums and so did wlad get over it.