Gerald McClellan was a bad man
Collapse
-
I agree.If the animal was threatening the mans life, then you are right. Someone who adopts a dog, tapes his mouth shut, then feeds him to his pitbull belongs in Hell. It's not your place to decide whether an animal is expendable like that. Obviously you are a person of low moral values.
Gerald was a good boxer but he got what was coming to him. Only cruel, sadistic human beings would thin of harming animals.Last edited by RichCCFC; 08-22-2008, 11:56 AM.Comment
-
He sounds like a very fucked up individual, but that doesn't mean he deserved what happened to him. I don't condone anything he did and he did deserve to be punished for it, but what happened to him was horrific. G-man knew the risks of getting into a boxing ring though, let alone getting into the ring with Nigel Benn. Could have/could still happen to anyone.Comment
-
Becuz we need to understand that in American dogs are more loved and valued. Like I said, I'm sure there is a place out there ATLEAST that doesn't kill roosters. ****, what would happen if we kill a cow in india?...we'd be put to death. To answer your question...I don't think they're a difference. All about how you value it. Funny cuz recently in the news there this huge ass lobster in display at a restaurant and the guy wouldn't eat it. He loves his lobster.Comment
-
How about **** fighting?? People that do that ****...do they deserve what happen to G-Man??Comment
-
Personally I find the people much more messed up that believe a human being deserved to be brain damaged for being involved in dog fighting. You people are ****ed up.Comment
Comment