Never fighting a guy or losing to a guy then refusing to rematch him in the future. Consider it against a top contender.
What is worse?
Collapse
-
What is worse?
14Never fighting78.57%11Never trying to get a rematch21.43%3The poll is expired.
Tags: None -
I was kind of torn but i feel not trying to get a rematch is worse. If you never fight someone there is no conclusive answer on who the better man is, you can guess or discuss but there is nothing certain.
On the other hand if you fight someone and lose then refuse to fight that person again your basically admitting who the better man is and there is nothing you can do about it.
They are both bad though.Comment
-
in this order
1. never fighting
2. waiting til your old and irrelevant (roy) to fight someone you should have 5 years ago (calzaghe)
3. never having a rematchComment
-
Never fighting.
Anyone saying otherwise is gassed up on Margarito Williams.
Imagine Ali not fighting Frazier even once.Comment
-
Being narrow minded again I see. This is not about specifics this about genralities of the boxing world. There are a lot of reason why a fight may not take place. Where as the reason for not having a rematch against a guy that beat you is more clear.Comment
-
Your own poll says otherwise.
But you're not really a boxing fan. You just like to make money off of the fights.Comment
-
I could care less i was curious what other thought. I doubt they really put much thought into it. They are both bad but it is degrees of bad really. You don't seem to understand why not looking for a rematch is a bad thing though.
As for my ******** on boxing, I follow boxing insanely close and I put aside my feelings aside so i can analyze it better. You seem to fail to get that betting to win money is a hard thing to do and if you do not understand boxing you will get your ass handed to you.Comment
Comment