Tweet
Basically mate, you are a bit thick. You named me in your first post as some sort of delusional nuthugger with the most outlandish views on boxing and Joe Calzaghe, although obviously you didn't use words as big as those.
What you fail to realise is that there is nothing outlandish about my views at all, that in fact they are perfectly reasonable. There is a very strong case for believing that Joe Calzaghe is the best boxer around at the moment, and it is exactly the strength of that case that leads most to agree that he is P4P #2, its just that most believe Pacquiao's case is that bit stronger, and I have no problem with that, this is what we call an opinion. Far from me being the one with outrageous views, I'm sorry to say that it is you, since you are the one posting threads branding people who don't share your opinion as idiots. You are the one pushing an agenda, and you are the one obscuring the facts.
What you fail to realise is that there is nothing outlandish about my views at all, that in fact they are perfectly reasonable. There is a very strong case for believing that Joe Calzaghe is the best boxer around at the moment, and it is exactly the strength of that case that leads most to agree that he is P4P #2, its just that most believe Pacquiao's case is that bit stronger, and I have no problem with that, this is what we call an opinion. Far from me being the one with outrageous views, I'm sorry to say that it is you, since you are the one posting threads branding people who don't share your opinion as idiots. You are the one pushing an agenda, and you are the one obscuring the facts.
Comment