Both were very exciting fighters but I'd say Tyson was more exciting overall. Just look at his first 20-25 fights when he was simply destroying everyone he faced. Many in the very first round!! When he came about he electrified the HW division and blasted out all of those bums! I still get all psyched up when I watch those old fights.
who was more entertaining Holyfield or Tyson ?
Collapse
-
Tyson gave you the WOW factor. He would crush his oppenents with combos and upper cuts and you watcht hem fall. Holyfield had some fierce battles with Bowe, Foreman and others. you would see Holy get hit and be like OMG I can't belive this guy is still standing.....Toss up for me...i love Tyson I go with the KO and the guys crumbling. If you want to see wars like Holywatch the lighter weight classes you watch the heavys to see KO's...Lefty
what made Holy so special though is the fact he could keep up the same intensity as a middleweight and he was able to comeback when he looked completely done i think Holy is a remarkable man /fighter
if u wanna see Knockouts watch Wladimir KlitshckoComment
-
thats fair enough
i like watching punchers but i also like watching aggresive fighters that cant crack as hard but put preassure on their oponents and throw combos to overwhelm them and when it is done skillfully i appreciate it even more
i guess id put Norris & Holy in the same catergory both were not great punchers but boy did they did put it on youComment
-
-
-
Tyson was more entertaining to me because either he would knock someone's head off in two rounds, or he'd get KTFO or DQ later in the fight. However, Holyfield was the better overall fighter and his fights with Bowe and win over Tyson showed off his skills and his will.Comment
Comment