Tweet
This is just my opinion on nuthuggers. I know Ill probably get some backlash but who cares..I dont have a have a problem with boxing fans because thats what we are. We are fans of boxing and of course we have our fav. fighters. to each is own. We pull for our fighters but if your like me your just happy your getting a badass match. Nuthuggers on the other hand are truly a bunch of douch bags..They come up with horrible post trying to discredit one another. Threads that make no sense acting like their fighter is almighty. Hard for them to take a loss and a win..It goes both ways their fighter wins the act like they won the damn fight and posting threads like they got two ****s. Their fighter loses all of a sudden they dissapear or come up with the most lame excuses on to why their fighter lost. These actions make me want your fighter to lose just so you can shut your trap!!! Point is quit huggin nuts and appreciate the sport for the entertainment it gives you regardless of which two men are fighting...
-
-
I agree, nuthuggers need to sort it out. -
Hahahahaha.....................
How bout these: Calzaghe has a good resume..................Or or.....Calzaghe beat BHop by 5 rounds.............Comment
-
See everybody has fav fighters your right, but its a matter of how you go about talking about this fighter, posting about this fighter. And or, discussing the fact that after anytime you read something about this fighter you jump in a really try to discredit someone's statement, even though we all know it's true.
Look, I'm a huge RJJR fan for instance. I didn't pick him to beat Antonio Tarver the 3rd time (actually I masde like 100 bucks off Tarver that night). I also thought that Tarver may have had a good shot in the 2nd fight. Of course noone thought we were going to see that land. He landed a great punch, he threw it with intentions of landing, no matter how much his head was down he threw it with the intention of hitting Jones, so theree goes that lucky punch theory.
Things like this right here, we can all be great fans of our fav. fighters, but lets all be rational here, not be over the top with it, and yes have an opinion, but dont try to discredit fact because he's your fav fighter!!Comment
-
I truly undertand we are all proud of our heritage and nationality but sometimes it gets out of control...Comment
-
great post,
nuthuggers bring down the quality of forums like this one,Comment
-
When you mean good, whats your basis though....I mean he's had some good wins, but his overall resume lacked a big name for over 40 professional fights. And yes he did beat Eubank, but honestly how big is Eubank in America? Eubank had been in wars prior to this matach as is, but take nothing away from his victory. Lacy, Lacy was a talented fighter, but thats it. Was not great, lacked defensive ability, and had never been in a hard fight before. I watched Lacy fail to get rid of Ricahrd Grant, a bonified tough fighter who lacked any skill inside the ring. Lacy was not as far along as people thought he was at tha point in his career. Then you have Hopkins, who yes was 43, but Im not going to say anymore about that cuz the guy is a rare occasion of a 43 year old man. You have mixed reviews all over about who won the fight. Ask 20 ringside observers 10 say Hopkins, 10 say Calzaghe. Again not taking away f rom his W, cuz thats what the judges seen. But remember that he also won the fight by 1 point. This was his first real exposure to the American fight game. And for some odd reason it's at the age of 36?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
He came over way to late in his career to give him a great monaker like ATG for instance. What would have happened if he came over shortly after winning the title in 97? Is he really undefeated at this point in his career, then would he haved moved up to 175 to take on real opponents and challenges???
We wont know, look he may go down as an ATG if hes able to win against Jones, which I dont think he will but we'll have to wait and see (Of course its my OPINION, I just think that Calz is way to sloppy, and he will be getting ripped with lead right hands all night until his eye is falling off). And if he can win his next big fight, hopefully against one Kelly Pavlik. I'm not saying he does possess great tools, and abilities in the ring. But..........................He by no means has a GOOD resume for a fighter who has been in the ring 45 times. Maybe after his next 2 fights we can say you know what Calz has a good resume, but not at this point at all...
And I know about the Sakio Bikas, Omar Sheikas, Mario Veits, and Mikkel Kesslers..............All good fighters.........But not nor where near great!Comment
-
I dont like it when someone tries to give a simple compliment to their favorite fighter, and then all of these people start saying mean things and try to discredit the fighter and the win and then discredit the poster who gave the simple compliment.
Its as if because their fighters in real life couldnt beat my favorite fighter, they then can somehow change things with mean words and lies.Comment
Comment