Gorres Camp Concerned About Montiel Rematch Judges

[Alibata]

A tip to those citing Ring magazine as a source on whether Montiel-Gorres was scored correctly: their stories are written by frickin' homers like the dude who wrote this post. It isn't like it's some objective journalist, for jesu sakes.
As I said before, if Gorres is so confident he was robbed at home, he shouldn't mind fighting in the champion's home country this time around. He's starting to sound like a German

Ring Magazine and Boxing Monthly is ran by Filipinos....hahahahaha!!!! Come on guy... How less bias than you can it be??... The ring magazine is considered the bible of boxing if you did not know and not run by some filipino with an agenda...

[v.cassiusali@ya]

gorres' camp should not worry for the judges but gorres capability to pull off against montiel. only the blinds saw gorres winning in their first fight.

its a shame to claim that gorres was robbed of victory. montiel was by far the more superior fighter than gorres.

even if the fight is held anywhere, i don't see gorres winning over montiel.

[Blue Öyster]

gorres is a crybaby and a bum!!!
montiel and vic both kicked his ass!!!!
gorrs is the one who always gets favors from judges!!!!

[giacomino]

Ring Magazine and Boxing Monthly is ran by Filipinos....hahahahaha!!!! Come on guy... How less bias than you can it be??... The ring magazine is considered the bible of boxing if you did not know and not run by some filipino with an agenda...

Didn't say Ring was run by Filipinos. I said the person who actually reports on the articles on title fights held in the Philippines is a local (a.k.a homers)
. Same thing with fights in Japan, the U.S., England, Germany, whatever. Unless it's a really big fight, a local covers the fights in each country. I've read the Ring for decades, but the fact that it calls itself the Bible of Boxing doesn't make it infallible

[CaRnAgEViOLaToR]

i dont know how people say gorres was "robbed" against montiel? sure the point deductions were controversial but montiel knocked gorres down twice in that fight and the ref didnt call them. gorres did a good job boxing but the man was beat up at the end and hanging on for survival.

[Alibata]

Didn't say Ring was run by Filipinos. I said the person who actually reports on the articles on title fights held in the Philippines is a local (a.k.a homers)
. Same thing with fights in Japan, the U.S., England, Germany, whatever. Unless it's a really big fight, a local covers the fights in each country. I've read the Ring for decades, but the fact that it calls itself the Bible of Boxing doesn't make it infallible

We dont live in the stone age dawg... These(non-Filipinos) people that wrote these articles and came to that conclusion actually watched the fights... I take it your Mexican right am I right? Its the opposite.. Only Mexicans thought Montiel won.. Ring Magazine rarely classifies fights as robberies and they did this one... Post the entire fight on here and have neutral people decide.. I bet you all my points they see Gorrez winning.

[Alibata]

i dont know how people say gorres was "robbed" against montiel? sure the point deductions were controversial but montiel knocked gorres down twice in that fight and the ref didnt call them. gorres did a good job boxing but the man was beat up at the end and hanging on for survival.

Marquez was knocked down a grip of times but your mexican ass wont see that. He did deduct a point which equals a KD. Thing is he deducting another one for clinching when it was probably the first clinch of the entire fight... Gorrez was clearly winning that fight...

[CaRnAgEViOLaToR]

this got nothing to do with race man. i happen to think gorres is one of the best boxers at 115 but everytime i watch it i come up with 114-112 montiel (6-6 with the point deductions). this was no robbery. more like a close fight that could have gone either way

[El Ceja]

they have that fight on youtube...check it out...^^^^^

[The Prowler]

gores is a devious coward!