You are a good poster, and this was a good post, but it didn't answer my question. I'm not trying to be a smarty but you posted: "What I am saying is if a fighter remains undefeated throughout their career, it is an indicator that they took a more careful path and did not seek out the toughest competition they could have unless they had a lot of luck on their side". I just wanted to know who the undefeated boxers were, and what you meant by this.
neither were overated are you high or something, Cotto beat the best out there except margarito, kuz he changed his style! Taylor beat the best around except Pavlik!
Neither beat the best. They were exposed as limited champs. That isn't a negative, it is a fact. They fooled you guys, but not me. They are B level fighters, they were never A list fighters.
neither were overated are you high or something, Cotto beat the best out there except margarito, kuz he changed his style! Taylor beat the best around except Pavlik!
Cotto beat everyone he was bigger than except Margs, his first true fight. Taylor was ripe for the picking. Why can't people just keep it real? We all respect fighters, but they are not bullet proof.
Tweet
Comment