I remember before the Margarito fight, that there were people saying that Miguel Cotto was a more skilled fighter than Tito Trinidad. That his career will end up being much better.
In retrospect (post-Margarito), what do you guys think of those claims? Is it still possible for Cotto to be a better fighter in his prime than Tito was? I personally don't think so, and didn't think so even before this loss. I mean, I'm not one of those people who heaps a bunch of criticism onto a fighter for a single loss, but in this scenario we have to keep in mind that Trinidad never had a loss at 147. Never had a loss at 154, neither. And this was against competition such as Vargas, Delahoya, Carr, and a prime, undefeated Yori Boy. All of whom were probably much better than anybody Cotto has beaten. And some of whom are much better than Margarito.
In retrospect (post-Margarito), what do you guys think of those claims? Is it still possible for Cotto to be a better fighter in his prime than Tito was? I personally don't think so, and didn't think so even before this loss. I mean, I'm not one of those people who heaps a bunch of criticism onto a fighter for a single loss, but in this scenario we have to keep in mind that Trinidad never had a loss at 147. Never had a loss at 154, neither. And this was against competition such as Vargas, Delahoya, Carr, and a prime, undefeated Yori Boy. All of whom were probably much better than anybody Cotto has beaten. And some of whom are much better than Margarito.
Comment