Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which fighter is the better fighter overall: Baldomir vs Eubank

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
    Tech, of course he would - look at the division. I reserve the word legend for...legends. Eubank in his prime was a pretty good fighter. Legend? I don't think so.
    Fair deal.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Clegg View Post
      This thread pretty much sums up how ****** this forum often is.

      "Who is Eubank?"
      "I think he might've been black"
      "I just look at boxrec. You actually watch boxing? Moron."
      "If I haven't heard of someone, they must be a bum"
      "My name is DiegoFuego. Duh. Duhhhhhh. Duuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhh"
      etc.

      I recently realised that I hadn't ever seen Freddie Norwood fight. So I started a thread asking for opinions of him (2 posters replied, such is the depth of knowledge around here/interest in non-******ed subjects), I read some old articles, and downloaded what I could find of him. I didn't just look at boxrec and say "he lost to Gainer and Gainer lost to someone I've never heard of 7 years later so Norwood must have been a bum".

      I don't understand how people on this forum seem to want to debate a subject that they don't know anything about. If you did this in real life when people were discussing politics, history, philosophy or even some of the other sports that people watch, you would be laughed at.

      If you aren't familiar with a world champion who had his best years in the 1990s, there's nothing shameful about that, but to judge someone based upon your ignorance of them or their opposition, and then try and argue with someone who is basing their opinion upon knowledge and experience is a bit ridiculous.

      Much of this thread is made up of people looking at boxrec and then claiming that one guy is better than the other because they've heard of more of their opponents. If you haven't been watching boxing long, it's hardly surprising that you've heard of more of the opponents of someone who is still an active fighter than someone who has been retired for several years.

      I personally believe that Cotto would beat any of Mayweather's 147 or 140 opponents. Do I therefore decide to go around the forum claiming that Margarito would beat Mayweather based upon this? No. Nor should anyone with an IQ above 0.

      Actually that's a bad example, because I have actually seen Mayweather, Cotto, Margarito, Hatton, Judah, Baldomir etc. fight several times, whereas in this thread people are rating old, shot 147 Gatti above a Benn and Watson that they've never watched.

      I wouldn't think that I'd need to say that on a boxing forum, but how about you guys go away and watch some boxing?
      Quality post.



      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Adolf
        ИATAS206, DiegoFuego, El Dominicano, Evil_Meat, Flawless, Grappler_Baki60, KostyaTszyu44, markeeta, oaklandstephen, P4PKING_2008, Pico Hollywood, Pullcounter, SKULLSPLITTER, them_apples, thesyndicate, TRANSWARP

        Theese are the people who voted for Baldomir. Please explain why you voted for him.
        Well I see one diehard Judah fan, quite a few Mayweather meat swallowers, not sure about the other few. Idiots, maybe?

        Baldomir had a very good chin, and he was able to inflate his record by fighting a lot of Argentine cab drivers (who he still managed to lose to quite a few.) He got lucky to get a DQ win over Clottey and managed to fight an old, shot WW version of Gatti. Throw in a close decision of Judah, who disappeared for the second half of the fight, and you have a career that's nothing to be ashamed about. But also does in no way compare to Eubank's.

        13 KO/TKOs in 62 fights. Things that make you go hmmmmm.....

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Sir_Joe View Post
          Are you ****ing ******?

          Anyone who picks Baldomir should be shot on the spot.
          ..........

          Comment


          • I reported Adolf. My report was he constantly bumps up old threads.




            Talk about getting Owned

            Comment


            • Originally posted by KLITSCHKO. View Post
              Eubank was a very good fighter

              Baldomir was a journeyman bum


              The ******s AKA Calzaghe haters will vote for Baldomir


              The posters with PLAIN AND BASIC COMMON SENSE will vote for Eubank
              you do know eubank was black right? oh wait you supported a black guy here so it makes joe look better

              LOL so pathetic

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Malcolm. View Post
                I reported Adolf. My report was he constantly bumps up old threads.




                Talk about getting Owned
                did he get banned?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by LordVoldemort View Post
                  did he get banned?
                  Yep, I reported his ass

                  Comment


                  • Eubank was a very good fighter he just never bothered to step it up in his prime years and paid for it when he was over the hill.

                    He had Benn, Watsonx2, Rocchigiani, Malinga on his resume. Not a legend but a far better fighter than Baldomir Eubank notched up quite a few title defenses and was never down even against big hitters like Benn and Thompson.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Flawless View Post
                      Which fighter is the better fighter overall: Baldomir vs Eubank
                      OMFG.





                      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP