Hatton will now, and when/if, they meet - destroy Pac. I give Pac HUGE kudos on him taking the BIG fights and throwing caution to the wind. THAT, ladies and turds, is what I believe boxing is supposed to be. Fight the big fights that people want to see. On the flip side, I can see why taking Oscar makes sense, and money, for ONLY Pac, who will come out of that bout, regardless of the outcome, looking to secure another big name. Pac can lose that fight yet lose NOTHING in the area of marketablility, Hatton/Pac - JMM/Pac - Pac/" put name here " - it doesn't really matter. Pac is a fighter with HEART. Oscar is the one who should be ashamed here and is the only one with anything to lose IMO. Again, as I posted, to stay on topic, Mayweather/Pac shouldn't even be considered. It would just be a one sided beat down.
Mayweather vs Pacquiao @ 140?
Collapse
-
Hatton will now, and when/if, they meet - destroy Pac. I give Pac HUGE kudos on him taking the BIG fights and throwing caution to the wind. THAT, ladies and turds, is what I believe boxing is supposed to be. Fight the big fights that people want to see. On the flip side, I can see why taking Oscar makes sense, and money, for ONLY Pac, who will come out of that bout, regardless of the outcome, looking to secure another big name. Pac can lose that fight yet lose NOTHING in the area of marketablility, Hatton/Pac - JMM/Pac - Pac/" put name here " - it doesn't really matter. Pac is a fighter with HEART. Oscar is the one who should be ashamed here and is the only one with anything to lose IMO. Again, as I posted, to stay on topic, Mayweather/Pac shouldn't even be considered. It would just be a one sided beat down. -
It does when you square up like Pac does. It can work well to off-set the southpaw jab and to set up straight rights. It also works well in conjunction if you duck down with the shoulder roll. Many fighters have used it to great effect against southpaws. Counter right hand off the shoulder roll can be brutal especially when followed up by a left hook.
Just check out Toney's fights against southpaws for recent examples of it's use. He uses it brilliantly to off-set the best advantage that the southpaw has. Mayweather actually has more trouble with southpaws and I think that is one of his biggest weaknesses. Lucky he never had to fight a great southpaw. Either way though, it can be used very well against southpaws.Last edited by BennyST; 10-08-2008, 04:22 AM.Comment
-
floyd would stop him in the late rounds or wide UD him
hes just way to fast and skilled for pac and pac would eat so many shots i see him going down a few timesComment
-
Comment
-
pbf maybe superior in boxing than pac, but most ppl say that to all of pac's opponents, but looked what happened to them. mab and erik were superior. jmm is truly a superior technician boxer and he catches pac yes. but ppl forget that pac easily tags him too. and winning! a lot of ppl says jmm is on level w/ pbf w/ regards to skill right? so saying EASILY doesnt hold water.Floyd easily and I MEAN EASILY! He is the superior boxer with faster feet and hands. Nothing Pac can do will change the outcome. I don't "prefer" Mayweather either but I can't be blinded by "what if's" and think Pac somehow will even be able to challenge him in the fight. Just a routing and I hope it doesn't happen. P.S. I think Hatton would decimate Pac and we all saw what Jr. did to him.Comment
-
-
It's gotta be Mayweather. I could even see a KO victory. Look at the first? Morales-Pac fight when Morales was landing the right hand consistently. Floyd's got much more power and maybe more speed.Comment
-
IMO, JMM isn't on PBF's level of skill. While a great boxer, not a PBF. Let's say, for a second, that he is... add the weight advantage + his speed = easily.pbf maybe superior in boxing than pac, but most ppl say that to all of pac's opponents, but looked what happened to them. mab and erik were superior. jmm is truly a superior technician boxer and he catches pac yes. but ppl forget that pac easily tags him too. and winning! a lot of ppl says jmm is on level w/ pbf w/ regards to skill right? so saying EASILY doesnt hold water.Comment
Comment