Kelly Pavlik no1 pfp fighter

**mojack** · 08-01-2008, 03:02 AM

What a load of bollocks.

**Kilrain** · 08-01-2008, 03:03 AM

I think Pac deserves it. He's won titles in 4 different weights

**mojack** · 08-01-2008, 03:10 AM

There really is no best pound for pound fighter in boxing; the whole concept is illogical since there are so many different weight classes in the sport. P4P is just a cheesy marketing ploy to hype fighters.

**Oriachim** · 08-01-2008, 03:14 AM

Originally posted by mojack

There really is no best pound for pound fighter in boxing; the whole concept is illogical since there are so many different weight classes in the sport. P4P is just a cheesy marketing ploy to hype fighters.

i thought pfp was down to skill, excitement, ring generalship, defence and technique, i honestly believed mayweather had the talent/skill to beat ANY individual supposing he was in that weight class and had the frame/build to support it.

**mojack** · 08-01-2008, 03:18 AM

Originally posted by Oriachim

i thought pfp was down to skill, excitement, ring generalship, defence and technique, i honestly believed mayweather had the talent/skill to beat ANY individual supposing he was in that weight class and had the frame/build to support it.

Believing and do'ing are 2 completely different things at opposite ends of the Univerise, many believe Floyd would beat Cotto, many believed Cotto would beat Margarito. The fact is it's easy to assess anything for paper value, and nobody really knows....for christs sake just losing 1 fight can drop a fighters rankings to the bottom of the P4P list which proves my point...P4P is mostly based on speculation and somebody's personal opinion.

Kelly Pavlik no1 pfp fighter