Who's performance was more admirable?

[jack_the_rippuh]

Considering that Byrd actually attempted to fight Wlad, and Wlad decided to kitten paw Ibragimov for 12rnds, i will have to say Byrd.

If that's your reason you obviously don't read up on the build up to a fight.

Byrd fought Wladimir because he would've gotten stripped if he didn't.

Wladimir fought Barney Rubble because he was doing what the fans wanted. Attempting to unify!

[TheGreatA]

Some pictures to help you decide...

[THE REED]

If that's your reason you obviously don't read up on the build up to a fight.

Byrd fought Wladimir because he would've gotten stripped if he didn't.

Wladimir fought Barney Rubble because he was doing what the fans wanted. Attempting to unify!

But that wasnt the thread title...

it said whose performance was more admirable...

not who had a better reason to fight who they fought..

[jack_the_rippuh]

What's even more ree****yaluss is that a Roy fan would think a guy taking maximum punishment is more admirable than a guy doing what he has to do to win.

[jack_the_rippuh]

But that wasnt the thread title...

it said whose performance was more admirable...

not who had a better reason to fight who they fought..

I understand that.
My previous post was only a response to him saying, "Considering Byrd actually attempted to fight Wlad..."

I was explaining that Byrd had no choice.

[THE REED]

What's even more ree****yaluss is that a Roy fan would think a guy taking maximum punishment is more admirable than a guy doing what he has to do to win.

Yeah but nuthuggers only talk about discuss and care about their fighter with a ree****yaluss biasness.

I actually care about the sport, and all the other fighters and fights going on... So even though Roy doesnt have a particular quality that I find admirable... doesnt mean I still dont find it admirable.

And cotto did do what he had to do to win... at the end of the day, he just couldnt do it... doesnt mean he didnt give everything he had to do it though.

I understand that.
My previous post was only a response to him saying, "Considering Byrd actually attempted to fight Wlad..."

I was explaining that Byrd had no choice.

understandable

[kayjay]

"who's" is a contraction of "who is," which makes no sense in the title. You should have typed 'whose'.

[jack_the_rippuh]

"who's" is a contraction of "who is," which makes no sense in the title. You should have typed 'whose'.

You yanks never could understand satire.

[Kobe Bryant]

"who's" is a contraction of "who is," which makes no sense in the title. You should have typed 'whose'.

Your grammar is admirable.

[kayjay]

You yanks never could understand satire.

The Anorak ripoff is actually a good move for you.