Why does losing = EXPOSED?

**rizkybizness** · 07-29-2008, 10:34 AM

Originally posted by johnm

Everytime a fighter (mainly when undefeated) gets beat, he's "Exposed!!!!!Pweneddfefd!!1ONE" So, this day in age, a fighter can't just lose a fight, and come back to have a great career? He HAS to have been exposed as an overrated bum? I obviously did not receive this memo.

Discuss.

This doesnt apply to Cotto but Hatton was exposed for the bum he truly is.

**mojack** · 07-29-2008, 10:34 AM

Because it's the BS rules!!

Just accept it.

**rizkybizness** · 07-29-2008, 10:36 AM

Originally posted by mojack

Because it's the BS rules!!

Just except it.

I think you mean "accept" not "except"

**johnm is...** · 07-29-2008, 10:36 AM

Originally posted by RIZO OWNS

This doesnt apply to Cotto but Hatton was exposed for the bum he truly is.

I agree it happens. Ala Lacy. But it's every single fight, every single time. He'll i've seen several posts in NSB referring to Cotto as overrated. It's unreal.

**UnderPressure** · 07-29-2008, 10:36 AM

Originally posted by mojack

Because it's the BS rules!!

Just except it.

Except what?

**mojack** · 07-29-2008, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by RIZO OWNS

I think you mean "accept" not "except"

I don't know what you're talking about, hey you've edited my quote!!!

**mojack** · 07-29-2008, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by UnderPressure

Except what?

Too late, Rizo got first dabs, you snooze you lose.

**T-97** · 07-29-2008, 10:38 AM

Originally posted by johnm

I agree it happens. Ala Lacy. But it's every single fight, every single time. He'll i've seen several posts in NSB referring to Cotto as overrated. It's unreal.

Yep, totally agree. I saw some people saying Cotto was exposed! WTF!?

**benjamin2004** · 07-29-2008, 10:38 AM

I say it's ignorance and a reason for the naysayers to say "I told you so" after 32 fights, after Judah and Mosley, in Cotto's case.

Why does losing = EXPOSED?