This last Saturday night, Miguel Cotto attempted to use the blueprint that Oscar De La Hoya used against Tito Trinidad. Cotto's gameplan, however went **** up on his ass. It turned out worse for him than it did for Oscar. At least Oscar made it to the final bell.
How ironic in that another great Mexican vs Puerto Rican rivalry fight at Welterweight we get similar results. Make no mistake, this weekend's fight was hella better than the last superfight at 147lbs between the two great boxing cultures. But the strategies were similar where the smaller, faster, better skilled boxer attempted to wow his bigger, stronger, more aggressive opponent. In both fights, the boxer failed.
Cotto however suffered a beating. And this brings me to a couple of questions:
Was Oscar better in his prime than Miguel, because he was able to make it to the final bell against Tito in a fight that many thought he won?
Or, was Margarito's pressure more effective, brutal and consistent than Tito's was against Goldy?
Or, was it a combination of the two?
I've been contimplating how the four great Welters would match up against each other in thier primes.
How ironic in that another great Mexican vs Puerto Rican rivalry fight at Welterweight we get similar results. Make no mistake, this weekend's fight was hella better than the last superfight at 147lbs between the two great boxing cultures. But the strategies were similar where the smaller, faster, better skilled boxer attempted to wow his bigger, stronger, more aggressive opponent. In both fights, the boxer failed.
Cotto however suffered a beating. And this brings me to a couple of questions:
Was Oscar better in his prime than Miguel, because he was able to make it to the final bell against Tito in a fight that many thought he won?
Or, was Margarito's pressure more effective, brutal and consistent than Tito's was against Goldy?
Or, was it a combination of the two?
I've been contimplating how the four great Welters would match up against each other in thier primes.


Comment