Was Wlad-Ibragimov a boring fight? [POLL]

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ryn0
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 11139
    • 310
    • 269
    • 20,767

    #1

    Was Wlad-Ibragimov a boring fight? [POLL]

    Vote! Bad-Wlad thinks Wlad-Ibragimov was a great technical fight. It was rubbish absolutely terrible first with not a minute of action that you could put on a highlight reel.
    2
    Yes because I have sanity
    100.00%
    2
    No it was great and i'm a moron
    0.00%
    0
  • Kball15
    HATTON WRIGHT PAVLIK
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 15471
    • 491
    • 86
    • 22,680

    #2
    There was nothing technical and there was absolutely nothing great about Klitschko-Ibragimov.

    it definetly ranks among the most boring heavyweight fights i have ever seen. If not THE. In a technical fight you still throw punches, and in a great technical fight you throw LOTS of hard punches

    Comment

    • Ryn0
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2007
      • 11139
      • 310
      • 269
      • 20,767

      #3
      Sorry double post

      Comment

      • irishjohn88
        Contender
        • Jul 2008
        • 178
        • 7
        • 2
        • 6,217

        #4
        yeah i agree this was a boring fight i wish some how Ibragimov would of won though, i ****ing hate wlad

        Comment

        • Ryn0
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 11139
          • 310
          • 269
          • 20,767

          #5
          Originally posted by irishjohn88
          yeah i agree this was a boring fight i wish some how Ibragimov would of won though, i ****ing hate wlad
          vote in the other thread please

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP