Cotto-Margarito: Skip Around "The Ring?"

[crold1]

Agree that Mosley is too high, but Boxing Monthly in the UK also has Molsey second. pretty much everyone agrees with the top four. Differnece of opinion, even when one opinion (mine) is better is not neccesarily bias. As to P4P, the Hopkins rating is whack, but that's not a title of a real division so I could care less. P4P is like toliet paper...great to have around but ultimately worth ****. I even got a note from a guy at Ring saying they agreed Mosley was too high...it's not like they have no dissent from within.

[Scott9945]

Agree that Mosley is too high, but Boxing Monthly in the UK also has Molsey second. pretty much everyone agrees with the top four. Differnece of opinion, even when one opinion (mine) is better is not neccesarily bias. As to P4P, the Hopkins rating is whack, but that's not a title of a real division so I could care less. P4P is like toliet paper...great to have around but ultimately worth ****. I even got a note from a guy at Ring saying they agreed Mosley was too high...it's not like they have no dissent from within.

That's a valid point about P4P. It's not like there are mandatory challengers or one linear champion there. But once again, the ownership of the magazine makes these ratings subject to closer scrutiny. Golden Boy has a lot of rated fighters now so they should be very aware of that.

[crold1]

Absolutely true Scott.